Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating
- Source :
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 80:463-470
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Background The effect of colon preparation quality on adenoma detection rates (ADRs) is unclear, partly because of lack of uniform colon preparation ratings in prior studies. The New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry collects detailed data from colonoscopies statewide, by using a uniform preparation quality scale after the endoscopist has cleaned the mucosa. Objective To compare the overall and proximal ADR and serrated polyp detection rates (SDR) in colonoscopies with differing levels of colon preparation quality. Design Cross-sectional. Setting New Hampshire statewide registry. Patients Patients undergoing colonoscopy. Interventions We examined colon preparation quality for 13,022 colonoscopies, graded by using specific descriptions provided to endoscopists. ADR and SDR are the number of colonoscopies with at least 1 adenoma or serrated polyp (excluding those in the rectum and/or sigmoid colon) detected divided by the total number of colonoscopies, for the preparation categories: optimal (excellent and/or good), fair, and poor. Main Outcome Measurements Overall/proximal ADR/SDR. Results The overall detection rates in examinations with fair colon preparation quality (SDR 8.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-10.7, ADR 27.1%; 95% CI, 24.6-30.0) were similar to rates observed in colonoscopies with optimal preparation quality (SDR 8.8%; 95% CI, 8.3-9.4, ADR 26.3%; 95% CI, 25.6-27.2). This finding also was observed for rates in the proximal colon. A logistic regression model (including withdrawal time) found that proximal ADR was statistically lower in the poor preparation category (odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84; P Limitations Homogeneous population. Conclusion In our sample, there was no significant difference in overall or proximal ADR or SDR between colonoscopies with fair versus optimal colon preparation quality. Poor colon preparation quality may reduce the proximal ADR.
- Subjects :
- Adenoma
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Colorectal cancer
Population
Colonic Polyps
Rectum
Colonoscopy
Cathartic
Adenocarcinoma
Gastroenterology
Article
Cohort Studies
Internal medicine
Humans
New Hampshire
Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Registries
education
Aged
education.field_of_study
medicine.diagnostic_test
Cathartics
business.industry
Sigmoid colon
Odds ratio
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
Logistic Models
medicine.anatomical_structure
Female
Colorectal Neoplasms
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00165107
- Volume :
- 80
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8f2c8b78678b965f78dfa208c6bdb747
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.021