Back to Search Start Over

Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis

Authors :
D.S. Stember
Laurence A. Levine
Run Wang
Sidney Glina
Elizabeth A. Phillips
Martin S. Gross
Nelson E. Bennett
David Ralph
J. Cedeno
William P. Conners
Michael Bickell
M. Rosselló. Barbará
Bruce B. Garber
Rafael Carrion
M. Rosselló Gayá
Ricardo Munarriz
Jason M. Greenfield
Peter J. Stahl
Arthur L. Burnett
A. Thornton
William O. Brant
Odunayo Kalejaiye
Edgardo Becher
Edward Gheiler
Tobias S. Köhler
Pedro Maria
Cigdem Tanrikut
Joseph P. Alukal
Robert Carrasquillo
Stanton C. Honig
J.F. Eid
Gerard D. Henry
Miguel Pineda
Paul Perito
Source :
The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 14:455-463
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2017.

Abstract

Introduction Penile prosthesis infections remain challenging despite advancements in surgical technique, device improvements, and adoption of antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. Aim To investigate penile prosthesis infection microbiology to consider which changes in practice could decrease infection rates, to evaluate current antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, and to develop a proposed algorithm for penile prosthesis infections. Methods This retrospective institutional review board–exempt multi-institutional study from 25 centers reviewed intraoperative cultures obtained at explantation or Mulcahy salvage of infected three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs). Antibiotic usage was recorded at implantation, admission for infection, and explantation or salvage surgery. Cultures were obtained from purulent material in the implant space and from the biofilm on the device. Main Outcome Measures Intraoperative culture data from infected IPPs. Results Two hundred twenty-seven intraoperative cultures (2002–2016) were obtained at salvage or explantation. No culture growth occurred in 33% of cases and gram-positive and gram-negative organisms were found in 73% and 39% of positive cultures, respectively. Candida species (11.1%), anaerobes (10.5%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (9.2%) constituted nearly one third of 153 positive cultures. Multi-organism infections occurred in 25% of positive cultures. Antibiotic regimens at initial implantation were generally consistent with American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. However, the micro-organisms identified in this study were covered by these guidelines in only 62% to 86% of cases. Antibiotic selection at admissions for infection and salvage or explantation varied widely compared with those at IPP implantation. Conclusion This study documents a high incidence of anaerobic, Candida, and methicillin-resistant S aureus infections. In addition, approximately one third of infected penile prosthesis cases had negative cultures. Micro-organisms identified in this study were not covered by the AUA and EAU antibiotic guidelines in at least 14% to 38% of cases. These findings suggest broadening antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines and creating a management algorithm for IPP infections might lower infection rates and improve salvage success.

Details

ISSN :
17436109 and 17436095
Volume :
14
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8ef04d7924b83e0290d9d3913e9b22e0