Back to Search Start Over

A tool to improve functional outcome assessment of a multimodal program for patients with chronic low back pain: A study on walk tests (at comfortable and fast speed)

Authors :
Jean-Marie Casillas
Alexandre Naaim
Davy Laroche
Mickael Grelat
Anaïs Gouteron
Delphine Trampe
Source :
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 33:485-494
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
IOS Press, 2020.

Abstract

Background Tools for functional assessment of chronic low back pain (LBP) are lacking. Objective To determine the correlations and the responsiveness of the 400 m comfortable walk test (400 mCWT) and the 200 m fast-walk test (200 mFWT) in the functional assessment of a multimodal program. Methods One hundred and twenty-seven participants (68 females) with LBP and with or without radicular pain completed a Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, a Sorensen test, a Shirado test, a 400 mCWT and a 200 mFWT, at baseline and at the end of the program. Results No significant side effect was reported during walk tests. Walking speed was significantly increased after the program (0.18 ± 0.15 m.s-1 for the 400 mCWT and 0.17 ± 0.17 m.s-1 for the 200 mFWT). Clinical parameters were also significantly improved (82.02 ± 83.1 seconds for the Shirado, 92.1 ± 100.1 seconds for the Sorensen, -14.0 ± 12.9 for the Quebec scale). A significant relationship was found between the increase in walking speed for the two walk tests and the improvement of the Quebec scale. The gait speed improvement was close to the minimal clinically important change (95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.22) determined from the Quebec scale threshold (minimum detectable change). Conclusions Both 400 mCWT and 200 mFWT are correlated with functional parameters and are responsive for the functional assessment of LBP.

Details

ISSN :
18786324 and 10538127
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8e764962f9d7398c58ab5604a9bc24ba
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-171019