Back to Search Start Over

An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke

Authors :
Gerard M. Ribbers
Frank L. Silver
Liping Liu
Adam G. Kelly
Bo Norrving
Linda S. Williams
Joel Salinas
Sara M. Sprinkhuizen
Stephanie Gething
Mary G. George
C. A. Davie
Patrice Lindsay
Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins
Teri Ackerson
Eric Smith
Louise Morgan
Julie Bernhardt
Lee H. Schwamm
Rehabilitation Medicine
Source :
Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation; 47(1), pp 180-186 (2016), Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, Stroke, 47(1), 180-186. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
American Heart Association, 2016.

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.<br />Background and Purpose— Value-based health care aims to bring together patients and health systems to maximize the ratio of quality over cost. To enable assessment of healthcare value in stroke management, an international standard set of patient-centered stroke outcome measures was defined for use in a variety of healthcare settings. Methods— A modified Delphi process was implemented with an international expert panel representing patients, advocates, and clinical specialists in stroke outcomes, stroke registers, global health, epidemiology, and rehabilitation to reach consensus on the preferred outcome measures, included populations, and baseline risk adjustment variables. Results— Patients presenting to a hospital with ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were selected as the target population for these recommendations, with the inclusion of transient ischemic attacks optional. Outcome categories recommended for assessment were survival and disease control, acute complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes proposed for assessment at 90 days were pain, mood, feeding, selfcare, mobility, communication, cognitive functioning, social participation, ability to return to usual activities, and health-related quality of life, with mobility, feeding, selfcare, and communication also collected at discharge. One instrument was able to collect most patient-reported subdomains (9/16, 56%). Minimum data collection for risk adjustment included patient demographics, premorbid functioning, stroke type and severity, vascular and systemic risk factors, and specific treatment/care-related factors. Conclusions— A consensus stroke measure Standard Set was developed as a simple, pragmatic method to increase the value of stroke care. The set should be validated in practice when used for monitoring and comparisons across different care settings.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15244628 and 00392499
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation; 47(1), pp 180-186 (2016), Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, Stroke, 47(1), 180-186. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8e740ee301aa18316915092e40019cec