Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polyp Removal: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials

Authors :
Yuichi Mori
Pu Wang
Magnus Løberg
Masashi Misawa
Alessandro Repici
Marco Spadaccini
Loredana Correale
Giulio Antonelli
Honggang Yu
Dexin Gong
Misaki Ishiyama
Shin-ei Kudo
Shunsuke Kamba
Kazuki Sumiyama
Yutaka Saito
Haruo Nishino
Peixi Liu
Jeremy R. Glissen Brown
Nabil M. Mansour
Seth A. Gross
Mette Kalager
Michael Bretthauer
Douglas K. Rex
Prateek Sharma
Tyler M. Berzin
Cesare Hassan
Source :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools aimed at improving polyp detection have been shown to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. However, it is unknown how increased polyp detection rates by AI affect the burden of patient surveillance after polyp removal.We conducted a pooled analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials (5 in China, 2 in Italy, 1 in Japan, and 1 in the United States) comparing colonoscopy with or without AI detection aids. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients recommended to undergo intensive surveillance (ie, 3-year interval). We analyzed intervals for AI and non-AI colonoscopies for the U.S. and European recommendations separately. We estimated proportions by calculating relative risks using the Mantel-Haenszel method.A total of 5796 patients (51% male, mean 53 years of age) were included; 2894 underwent AI-assisted colonoscopy and 2902 non-AI colonoscopy. When following U.S. guidelines, the proportion of patients recommended intensive surveillance increased from 8.4% (95% CI, 7.4%-9.5%) in the non-AI group to 11.3% (95% CI, 10.2%-12.6%) in the AI group (absolute difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 1.4%-4.4%]; risk ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.16-1.57]). When following European guidelines, it increased from 6.1% (95% CI, 5.3%-7.0%) to 7.4% (95% CI, 6.5%-8.4%) (absolute difference, 1.3% [95% CI, 0.01%-2.6%]; risk ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.01-1.47]).The use of AI during colonoscopy increased the proportion of patients requiring intensive colonoscopy surveillance by approximately 35% in the United States and 20% in Europe (absolute increases of 2.9% and 1.3%, respectively). While this may contribute to improved cancer prevention, it significantly adds patient burden and healthcare costs.

Details

ISSN :
15427714
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8e574a8660cfe7f080b83a6ea85c733e