Randomized trial comparing two devices: the Palmaz-Schatz stent and the Strecker stent in bail-out situations

MLA

M. Hofmann, et al. “Randomized Trial Comparing Two Devices: The Palmaz-Schatz Stent and the Strecker Stent in Bail-out Situations.” Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 7, no. 6, Nov. 1994. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....8e2daa99c7162c94a0535a8ff85e59a8&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

M. Hofmann, Jürgen Haase, Th. Massa, Hans Störger, Michel Vandormael, W. Preusler, Franz Schwarz, & Nicolaus Reifart. (1994). Randomized trial comparing two devices: the Palmaz-Schatz stent and the Strecker stent in bail-out situations. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 7(6).

Chicago

M. Hofmann, Jürgen Haase, Th. Massa, Hans Störger, Michel Vandormael, W. Preusler, Franz Schwarz, and Nicolaus Reifart. 1994. “Randomized Trial Comparing Two Devices: The Palmaz-Schatz Stent and the Strecker Stent in Bail-out Situations.” Journal of Interventional Cardiology 7 (6). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....8e2daa99c7162c94a0535a8ff85e59a8&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.