Back to Search
Start Over
Pasture allowance, duration, and stage of lactation. Effects on early and total lactation animal performance
- Source :
- Journal of Dairy Science, Journal of Dairy Science, American Dairy Science Association, 2019, sous presse (sous presse), sous presse. ⟨10.3168/jds.2018-15784⟩, Journal of Dairy Science, American Dairy Science Association, 2019, 102 (10), pp.8986-8998. ⟨10.3168/jds.2018-15784⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Pasture availability in early spring can be limited due to climatic effects on grass production, increasing the likelihood of feed deficits in early lactation of spring-calving pasture-based systems. We hypothesized that restricting pasture allowance (PA) when animals are at peak milk production will have more negative implications on milk production compared with restricting animals before this period. A total of 105 cows were assigned to 1 of 7 grazing treatments from March 14 to October 31, 2016 (33 wk). The control treatment was offered a PA to achieve a postgrazing sward height > 3.5 cm and mean pasture allowance of 15.5 kg of dry matter per cow. The remaining treatments were offered a PA representing 60% of that offered to the control for a duration of 2 or 6 wk from March 14 (mid-March; MMx2 and MMx6), March 28 (end of March; EMx2 and EMx6), or April 11 (mid-April; MAx2 and MAx6). Within grazing treatment, animals were also assigned to 1 of 2 calving dates (early and late) based on days in milk (DIM) on March 14. Early calved (EC) cows were ≥36 DIM, while late calved (LC) were ≤35 DIM. Restricting PA for 2 and 6 wk reduced daily milk yield (−1.6 and −2.2 kg/cow, respectively), cumulative milk protein yield (−4.0 and −6.3 kg/cow, respectively), and cumulative milk solids yield (−5.8 and −9.5 kg/cow, respectively) in the first 10 wk of the experiment. Daily milk yield was similar across the treatments at the end of the 33-wk period (16.8 kg/cow, average of all treatments), as was daily milk solids yield (1.40 kg/cow). Cows in the EC group produced less milk over the first 10 wk of the experiment (20.0 kg/cow per day) compared with the LC animals (22.1 kg/cow per day). However, body weight was greater (+15 kg/cow) in the EC animals compared with the LC, while body condition score was similar (2.85). This outcome indicates that animals that are restricted later in early lactation (circa onset of peak milk production) partition a greater proportion of available energy to maintenance, resulting in greater losses in milk production. These data indicate that despite the immediate reduction in milk production, restricting intake of grazing cows to 80% of that required to achieve spring grazing targets for postgrazing sward height for up to 6 wk may be used as a method of managing short-term pasture deficits on farm with minimal effects on total lactation performance.
- Subjects :
- [SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences
pâturage
Allowance (money)
Ice calving
Pasture
Random Allocation
Milk yield
Lactation
Grazing
dairy cows
2. Zero hunger
0303 health sciences
geography.geographical_feature_category
[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology
food and beverages
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Milk Proteins
Dairying
Milk
medicine.anatomical_structure
vache laitière
Pasture allowance
Female
animal feeding
Seasons
alimentation animale
stade de lactation
Biology
Poaceae
03 medical and health sciences
Animal science
Body condition score
Genetics
medicine
Dairy cow
Animals
Dry matter
grazing
production de lait
030304 developmental biology
geography
Body Weight
0402 animal and dairy science
Animal Feed
040201 dairy & animal science
Diet
Cattle
Animal Science and Zoology
Early lactation stage
Food Science
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00220302
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Dairy Science, Journal of Dairy Science, American Dairy Science Association, 2019, sous presse (sous presse), sous presse. ⟨10.3168/jds.2018-15784⟩, Journal of Dairy Science, American Dairy Science Association, 2019, 102 (10), pp.8986-8998. ⟨10.3168/jds.2018-15784⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8d7ad1655a93f5b85c2f3290ef25ee4c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15784⟩