Back to Search Start Over

Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)

Authors :
Yoshitoyo Kagami
Hirokazu Nagai
Nobuko Kubota
Kazuto Takeuchi
Nobuhiko Nakamura
Harumi Kato
Hiroo Katsuya
Rie Ohba
Ken Ohmachi
Nobuyuki Takayama
Masahito Tokunaga
Kazutaka Sunami
Masahiro Kizaki
Ryunosuke Machida
Shinsuke Iida
Mitsutoshi Kurosawa
Tatsuo Ichinohe
Wataru Munakata
Hiroaki Morimoto
Yoshihiro Kameoka
Yoshitaka Imaizumi
Miki Kobayashi
Isao Yoshida
Dai Maruyama
Source :
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021.

Abstract

Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Methods Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Results Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. Conclusions The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.<br />The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria with two consecutive assessments in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Details

ISSN :
14653621
Volume :
51
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8d6281c1dd3d2a34776c9441e5d40a42
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyab066