Back to Search
Start Over
Sex is a strong prognostic factor in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients and should be considered in survival rate estimation
- Source :
- Cancer Epidemiology, r-CIPF. Repositorio Institucional Producción Científica del Centro de Investigación Principe Felipe (CIPF), instname, CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, r-FISABIO: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), r-IGTP. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Germans Trias i Pujol, r-FIHGUV. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundación de Investigación del Hospital General de Valencia, r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante, r-CIPF: Repositorio Institucional Producción Científica del Centro de Investigación Principe Felipe (CIPF), Centro de Investigación Principe Felipe (CIPF), r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2020.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Biological differences between the sexes have a major impact on disease and treatment outcome. In this paper, we evaluate the prognostic value of sex in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of routine clinical data, and compare this information with other external datasets. METHODS: Clinical data from stage IV NSCLC patients from Hospital Puerta de Hierro (HPH) were retrieved from electronic health records using big data analytics (N = 397). In addition, data from the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (GECP) Tumor Registry (N = 1382) and from a published study available from the cBioPortal (MSK) (N = 601) were analyzed. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic value of sex. A meta-analysis to compare the outcome for males and females in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was performed. RESULTS: The median OS time was 12 months for males and 19 months for females (overall HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.87; P < 0.001). Similarly, females with stage IV NSCLC harboring an EGFR-sensitizing mutation lived significantly longer than males (median OS: males, 19 months; females, 32 months) with a lower risk of death compared with males (overall HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.67-0.84). In addition, female patients benefited more from EGFR inhibitors in terms of PFS and OS (overall HR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32-0.64, and HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48-0.80, respectively). Median PFS was 21 months in females and 12 months in males (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using routine clinical data we confirmed the previous finding that among stage IV NSCLC patients, females had a significantly better prognosis than males. The effect size of the sex was notable, highlighting the fact that survival rates are usually estimated and patients are generally managed without considering the sexes separately, which may lead to suboptimal results.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Oncology
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Prognostic factor
Lung Neoplasms
Epidemiology
EGFR
Context (language use)
Disease
03 medical and health sciences
Sex Factors
0302 clinical medicine
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Non-small cell lung cancer
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Progression-free survival
Lung cancer
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Survival rate
Survival analysis
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Estimation
EGFR, Female, Gender, Non-small cell lung cancer, Sex
business.industry
Gender
Middle Aged
Prognosis
medicine.disease
respiratory tract diseases
ErbB Receptors
Survival Rate
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Mutation
Female
Sex
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 18777821
- Volume :
- 67
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cancer Epidemiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8d39f0063fed5917e4ad90935f53e4f0
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2020.101737