Back to Search Start Over

Development and Validation of the Danish Big Five Inventory-2

Authors :
Steven G. Ludeke
Simon Calmar Andersen
Oliver P. John
Anna Vedel
Kaare Bro Wellnitz
Christopher J. Soto
Source :
Vedel, A, Wellnitz, K B, Ludeke, S, Soto, C, John, O & Andersen, S C 2021, ' Development and validation of the Danish Big Five Inventory-2 : Domain-and facet-level structure, construct validity, and reliability ', European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 42-51 . https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000570, Vedel, A, Wellnitz, K B, Ludeke, S, Soto, C J, John, O P & Andersen, S C 2021, ' Development and validation of the Danish Big Five Inventory-2: Domain-and facet-level structure, construct validity, and reliability ', European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 42-51 . https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000570
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Hogrefe Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

Following the publication of the Big Five Inventory- 2 (BFI-2) and its abbreviated forms (the 30-item BFI-2-S and 15-item BFI-2-XS), two studies were conducted to develop and validate a Danish translation of these measures. Study 1 first developed a preliminary Danish BFI- 2 item pool consisting of translations of the 60 BFI-2 items, then tested and refined this item pool using two waves of data collection, and identified a set of 60-item formulations for the Danish BFI-2. Study 1 then examined the domain- and facet-level structure of the Danish BFI-2, and the construct validity and reliability of this measure. Study 2 tested the generalizability of the measurement properties of the Danish BFI-2 found in Study 1 as well as the preliminary measurement properties of its abbreviated forms (the Danish BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS) in a new sample. The results of these studies indicate that the Danish BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure with psychometric properties and construct validity corresponding to the English-language original. The preliminary results regarding measurement properties of the abbreviated forms are encouraging and should inspire further validation. 2020 Hogrefe Publishing.

Details

ISSN :
21512426 and 10155759
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8d28107b1df2347b63c1db38041aef7d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000570