Back to Search
Start Over
Comments on 'Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals'
- Source :
- Trials, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2019), Trials
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in assessing treatment regimens, and since abstracts may be the only part of a paper that a physician reads, accurate reporting of data in abstracts is essential. The CONSORT checklist for abstracts was designed to standardize data reporting; however, for papers submitted to anesthesiology journals, the level of adherence to the CONSORT checklist for abstracts is unknown. Therefore, we commend Janackovic and Puljak for their efforts in determining the adherence of reports of trials in the highest-impact anesthesiology journals between 2014 and 2016. The results of their study are extremely important; however, we believe that that study had some methodological limitations, which we discuss in this manuscript.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Letter
Reporting quality
media_common.quotation_subject
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Ranking (information retrieval)
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Anesthesiology
law
CONSORT for abstracts
Medicine
Pharmacology (medical)
Medical physics
Quality (business)
030212 general & internal medicine
Data reporting
media_common
lcsh:R5-920
business.industry
Treatment regimen
Gold standard
humanities
Checklist
Research Design
randomized controlled trials
Periodicals as Topic
lcsh:Medicine (General)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 17456215
- Volume :
- 20
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Trials
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8d11353911456a6e11535fa5d0499ddd