Back to Search Start Over

Methotrexate area under the curve is an important outcome predictor in patients with primary CNS lymphoma: A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis from the IELSG no. 20 trial

Authors :
Markus Joerger
F. Cavalli
Stephan Krähenbühl
Jan H.M. Schellens
A. D. R. Huitema
Michele Reni
A. J. M. Ferreri
Thomas Cerny
Emanuele Zucca
Joerger, M
Huitema, Adr
Krahenbuhl, S
Schellens, Jhm
Cerny, T
Reni, M
Zucca, E
Cavalli, F
Ferreri, Ajm
Source :
British Journal of Cancer
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This analysis was initiated to define the predictive value of the area under the curve of high-dose methotrexate (AUC(HD-MTX)) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 55 patients with PCNSL and available pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) no. 20 trial, randomised to HD-MTX (n = 30) or HD-MTX and high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) (n = 25). Individual AU(CHD-MTX) from population PK analysis was tested on drug toxicity and clinical outcome using multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox hazards modelling. RESULTS: AUC(HD-MTX), the IELSG score and treatment group were significant predictors for treatment response (complete or partial) in the adjusted model. The AU(CHD-MTX) did not predict toxicity, with the exception of liver toxicity and neutropaenia. A high AUC(HD-MTX) was associated with better event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0.01) and overall survival (OAS) (P = 0.02). Both the AUC(HD-MTX) and the IELSG score were significant predictors of EFS and OAS in the adjusted model, with a hazard ratio of 0.82 and 0.73, respectively, per 100 mu mol l(-1) h(-1) increase in AUC(HD-MTX). CONCLUSIONS: Individualised dosing of HD-MTX might have the potential to improve clinical outcome in patients with PCNSL, even when administered concurrently with HD-AraC. In the future, this could be carried out by using first-cycle PK modelling with determination of potential dose adaptations for later cycles using Bayesian analysis. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 673-677. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605559 www.bjcancer.com Published online 2 February 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8ba6384af75dae83d0545f2364508da8