Back to Search Start Over

Performance evaluation of Siemens ADVIA Centaur and Roche MODULAR Analytics E170 Total 25-OH Vitamin D assays

Authors :
Eleftherios P. Diamandis
Adrien LeBlanc
Yu Chen
Heather Tarr
Andrea Božović
Lois Kinney
Hilary Smith
Source :
Clinical Biochemistry. 45:1485-1490
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2012.

Abstract

To evaluate the newly developed Roche MODULAR Analytics E170 Total Vitamin D and the Siemens ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assays.Assays were evaluated using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Split patient samples were compared with LC-MS/MS and DiaSorin LIAISON assays (n=79 including 15 specimens with detectable endogenous 25-OH vitamin D(2)). Assay accuracy was also evaluated using the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples.The ADVIA Centaur and E170 assays demonstrated maximum total CVs of 14.1% and 5.9%, respectively. Both showed excellent linearity (R(2)0.99). The ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated interference with bilirubin at 800 μmol/L, hemolysis at 1.25 g/L, and triglycerides at 2.8 mmol/L. Compared to LC-MS/MS, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a R(2) value of 0.893, average bias of -8.8%; the E170 assay an R(2) value of 0.872, average bias of 14.3% with underestimation of 25-OH vitamin D(2). Compared to the LIAISON assay, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated an R(2) value of 0.781, average bias of -17.3%; the E170 assay an R(2) value of 0.823, average bias of 11.4%. The ADVIA Centaur and E170 assays demonstrated a biases of20% in 10/10 and 8/10 DEQAS samples, respectively.The ADVIA Centaur and E170 vitamin D assays demonstrated acceptable linearity, imprecision, and accuracy. The E170 assay demonstrated consistent underestimation of 25-OH vitamin D(2) levels. Compared with LC-MS/MS, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a higher R(2) value and a smaller average bias than the E170 assay.

Details

ISSN :
00099120
Volume :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Biochemistry
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8b84b7867512ab8c3552969cfcc6a143
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.002