Back to Search
Start Over
Validation of a Novel Multivariate Method of Defining HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment
- Source :
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6(6):UNSP ofz198. Oxford University Press, OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Open forum infectious diseases, 6(6):ofz198. Oxford University Press
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background The optimum method of defining cognitive impairment in virally suppressed people living with HIV is unknown. We evaluated the relationships between cognitive impairment, including using a novel multivariate method (NMM), patient– reported outcome measures (PROMs), and neuroimaging markers of brain structure across 3 cohorts. Methods Differences in the prevalence of cognitive impairment, PROMs, and neuroimaging data from the COBRA, CHARTER, and POPPY cohorts (total n = 908) were determined between HIV-positive participants with and without cognitive impairment defined using the HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), global deficit score (GDS), and NMM criteria. Results The prevalence of cognitive impairment varied by up to 27% between methods used to define impairment (eg, 48% for HAND vs 21% for NMM in the CHARTER study). Associations between objective cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive complaints generally were weak. Physical and mental health summary scores (SF-36) were lowest for NMM-defined impairment (P < .05). There were no differences in brain volumes or cortical thickness between participants with and without cognitive impairment defined using the HAND and GDS measures. In contrast, those identified with cognitive impairment by the NMM had reduced mean cortical thickness in both hemispheres (P < .05), as well as smaller brain volumes (P < .01). The associations with measures of white matter microstructure and brain-predicted age generally were weaker. Conclusion Different methods of defining cognitive impairment identify different people with varying symptomatology and measures of brain injury. Overall, NMM-defined impairment was associated with most neuroimaging abnormalities and poorer self-reported health status. This may be due to the statistical advantage of using a multivariate approach.<br />We have previously described a novel multivariate method (NMM) with theoretical statistical advantages over existing methods, which we assessed here in 3 cohorts of people living with HIV. Overall, NMM-defined impairment was associated with most neuroimaging abnormalities and poorer self-reported health status.
- Subjects :
- Multivariate statistics
medicine.medical_specialty
COmorBidity in Relation to AIDS (COBRA) Collaboration and the Pharmacokinetic and clinical Observations in PePle over fiftY (POPPY) Study Group
Immunology
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Audiology
medicine.disease_cause
Microbiology
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
multivariate
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Neuroimaging
Medicine and Health Sciences
medicine
Major Article
OLDER-PEOPLE
030212 general & internal medicine
VALIDITY
Cognitive impairment
cognitive impairment
Science & Technology
neuroimaging
SCORES
business.industry
Biology and Life Sciences
HIV
MEN
Cognition
Mental health
White matter microstructure
PREVALENCE
3. Good health
Infectious Diseases
Oncology
REGISTRATION
business
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Neurocognitive
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 23288957
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8ab405838013ac2eabc3e047556f8724