Back to Search Start Over

Collected World Experience About the Performance of the Snorkel/Chimney Endovascular Technique in the Treatment of Complex Aortic Pathologies

Authors :
Donas, K. P.
Lee, J. T.
Lachat, M.
Torsello, G.
Veith, F. J.
Dalman, R. L.
Tran, K.
Pecoraro, F.
Bisdas, T.
Seifert, S.
Esche, M.
Gasparini, D.
Frigatti, P.
Adovasio, R.
Mucelli, F. P.
Damrauer, S. M.
Woo, E. Y.
Beck, A.
Scali, S.
Minion, D.
Salenius, J.
Suominen, V.
Mangialardi, N.
Ronchey, S.
Fazzini, S.
Mestres, G.
Riambau, V.
Mosquera, N. J.
Donas, K.
Lee, J.
Lachat, M.
Torsello, G.
Veith, F.
Dalman, R.
Tran, K.
Pecoraro, F.
Source :
Annals of Surgery. 262:546-553
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze the collected worldwide experience with use of snorkel/chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aneurysm treatment. BACKGROUND: EVAR has largely replaced open surgery worldwide for anatomically suitable aortic aneurysms. Lack of availability of fenestrated and branched devices has encouraged an alternative strategy utilizing parallel or snorkel/chimney grafts (ch-EVAR). METHODS: Clinical and radiographic information was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed on 517 patients treated by ch-EVAR from 2008 from 2014 by prearranged defined and documented protocols. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients in US centers and 398 in European centers were treated during the study period. US centers preferentially used Zenith stent-grafts (54.2%) and European centers Endurant stent-grafts (62.2%) for the main body component. Overall 898 chimney grafts (49.2% balloon expandable, 39.6% self-expanding covered stents, and 11.2% balloon expandable bare metal stents) were placed in 692 renal arteries, 156 superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and 50 celiac arteries. At a mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range: 1-70 months), primary patency was 94%, with secondary patency of 95.3%. Overall survival of patients in this high-risk cohort for open repair at latest follow-up was 79%. CONCLUSIONS: This global experience represents the largest series in the ch-EVAR literature and demonstrates comparable outcomes to those in published reports of branched/fenestrated devices, suggesting the appropriateness of broader applicability and the need for continued careful surveillance. These results support ch-EVAR as a valid off-the-shelf and immediately available alternative in the treatment of complex abdominal EVAR and provide impetus for the standardization of these techniques in the future.

Details

ISSN :
00034932
Volume :
262
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....89e310eca7174255ef44ece777399612
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001405