Back to Search Start Over

An approach to help differentiate postinfarct scar from borderzone tissue using Ripple Mapping during ventricular tachycardia ablation

Authors :
Dibbendhu Khanra
Peter Calvert
Susan Hughes
Johan Waktare
Simon Modi
Mark Hall
Derick Todd
Saagar Mahida
Dhiraj Gupta
Vishal Luther
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 34:664-672
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Ventricular scar is traditionally highlighted on a bipolar voltage (BiVolt) map in areas of myocardium0.50mV. We describe an alternative approach using Ripple Mapping (RM) superimposed onto a BiVolt map to differentiate post-infarct scar from conducting borderzone (BZ) during VT ablation.15 consecutive patients (LVEF 30±7%) underwent endocardial LV Pentaray mapping (median 5148 points) and ablation targeting areas of late Ripple activation. BiVolt maps were studied offline at initial voltage of 0.50-0.50mV to binarize the color display (red and purple). RMs were superimposed, and the BiVolt limits were sequentially reduced until only areas devoid of Ripple bars appeared red, defined as RM-scar. The surrounding area supporting conducting Ripple wavefronts in tissue0.50mV defined the RM-Borderzone (RM-BZ).RM-scar was significantly smaller than the traditional 0.50mV cutoff (median 4% vs 12% shell area, p0.001). 65±16% of tissue0.50mV supported Ripple activation within the RM-BZ. The mean BiVolt threshold that differentiated RM-scar from borderzone tissue was 0.22±0.07mV, though this ranged widely (from 0.12mV-0.35mV). In this study, septal infarcts (7/15) were associated with more rapid VTs (282 vs 347ms, p=0.001), and had a greater proportion of RM-BZ to RM-scar (median ratio 3.2 vs 1.2, p=0.013) with faster RM-BZ conduction speed (0.72 vs 0.34 m/sec, p=0.001). Conversely, scars that supported hemodynamically stable sustained VT (6/15) were slower (367±38ms), had a smaller proportion of RM-BZ to RM-scar (median ratio 1.2 vs 3.2, p=0.059), and slower RM-BZ conduction speed (0.36 vs 0.63 m/sec, p=0.036). RM guided ablation collocated within 66±20% of RM-BZ, most concentrated around the RM-scar perimeter, with significant VT reduction (median 4.0 episodes pre-ablation vs 0 post, p0.001) at 11±6 months follow-up.Post-infarct scars appear significantly smaller than traditional 0.50mV cut-offs suggest, with voltage thresholds unique to each patient. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Details

ISSN :
15408167 and 10453873
Volume :
34
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....89bdd0ae008dc206a8b0c73c9f90424b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15766