Back to Search
Start Over
On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
- Source :
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 787:6-11
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2015.
-
Abstract
- In time of flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) and in particular for the EndoTOFPET-US Project (Frisch, 2013 [1] ), and other applications for high energy physics, the multi-digital silicon photomultiplier (MD-SiPM) was recently proposed (Mandai and Charbon, 2012 [2] ), in which the time of every single photoelectron is being recorded. If such a photodetector is coupled to a scintillator, the largest and most accurate timing information can be extracted from the cascade of the scintillation photons, and the most probable time of positron emission determined. The readout concept of the MD-SiPM is very different from that of the analog SiPM, where the individual photoelectrons are merely summed up and the output signal fed into the readout electronics. We have developed a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool that describes the timing properties of the photodetector and electronics, the scintillation properties of the crystal and the light transfer within the crystal. In previous studies we have compared MC simulations with coincidence time resolution (CTR) measurements and found good agreement within less than 10% for crystals of different lengths (from 3 mm to 20 mm) coupled to SiPMs from Hamamatsu. In this work we will use the developed MC tool to directly compare the highest possible time resolution for both the analog and digital readout of SiPMs with different scintillator lengths. The presented studies reveal that the analog readout of SiPMs with microcell signal pile-up and leading edge discrimination can lead to nearly the same time resolution as compared to the maximum likelihood time estimation applied to MD-SiPMs. Consequently there is no real preference for either a digital or analog SiPM for the sake of achieving highest time resolution. However, the best CTR in the analog SiPM is observed for a rather small range of optimal threshold values, whereas the MD-SiPM provides stable CTR after roughly 20 registered photoelectron timestamps in the time estimator.
- Subjects :
- Physics
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Scintillation
Time of flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET)
Photon
Physics::Instrumentation and Detectors
business.industry
Multi-digital SiPM
Monte Carlo method
Maximum likelihood time estimator
Photodetector
Scintillator
Coincidence time resolution (CTR)
Signal
Time of flight
Silicon photomultiplier
Optics
Detectors and Experimental Techniques
business
Instrumentation
Analog SiPM
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 01689002
- Volume :
- 787
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....89ac5fb0a23380ff91a416034ed4708c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.10.020