Back to Search Start Over

Contrasting genetic structures in sister species of North American scrub-jays

Authors :
John W. Fitzpatrick
David B. McDonald
Wayne K. Potts
Glen E. Woolfenden
Source :
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 266:1117-1125
Publication Year :
1999
Publisher :
The Royal Society, 1999.

Abstract

Threatened Florida scrub–jays ( Aphelocoma coerulescens breed communally, are restricted to xeric sandy scrub habitat, generally disperse fewer than three territory diameters. Closely related Western scrub–jays ( A. californica ) do not breed communally, have a broader habitat range, disperse greater distances, and are not threatened. We compared the genetic structure of 445 individuals in 11 populations in Florida with 157 individuals in eight populations of Western scrub–jays. At ten microsatellite loci, Florida had 24 out of 47 total alleles, while Western scrub–jays had 44. The Florida populations were more differentiated ( G ST = 0.048) than were a set of five California populations ( G ST = 0.015). A randomization extension of a Mantel test showed a stronger correlation between geographic and Cavalli–Sforza genetic distances among Western than Florida populations. Neighbour–joining trees clustered Florida populations from the same sandy ridge systems, suggesting that habitat continuity is more important than geographic proximity in allowing gene flow and preventing differentiation. For Western populations, isolation by distance appears to be the major determinant of genetic structure. Our results suggest that contrasting genetic structures may arise between closely related species, as a result of differences in ecology and social system. Conserving extant genetic variation in Florida jays will require maintaining viable populations in each of the major sandy ridge systems.

Details

ISSN :
14712954 and 09628452
Volume :
266
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....87c84805e4201dc4de0e07c3a28b26a3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0752