Back to Search Start Over

Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction during Follow-up in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Authors :
Kazuya Nagao
Katsuhisa Ishii
Shin Watanabe
Shinichi Shirai
Takao Kato
Norio Kanamori
Shintaro Matsuda
Kensuke Takabayashi
Tsukasa Inada
Takeshi Kimura
Yutaka Hirano
Yuichi Kawase
Makoto Miyake
Takeshi Kitai
Keiichiro Yamane
Yoshihiro Kato
Hirokazu Mitsuoka
Yasuyo Takeuchi
Current As Registry Investigators
Kenji Nakatsuma
Chisato Izumi
Tomoki Sasa
Naritatsu Saito
Ryusuke Nishikawa
Tomohiko Taniguchi
Koichiro Murata
Kanae Su
Eri Minamino-Muta
Moriaki Inoko
Kenji Minatoya
Akihiro Komasa
Takeshi Morimoto
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 12(24):2499-2511
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) managed conservatively. Background: No previous study has explored the association between LVEF decline during follow-up and clinical outcomes in patients with severe AS. Methods: Among 3, 815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the multicenter CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry in Japan, 839 conservatively managed patients who underwent echocardiography at 1-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was a composite of AS-related deaths and hospitalization for heart failure. Results: There were 91 patients (10.8%) with >10% declines in LVEF and 748 patients (89.2%) without declines. Left ventricular dimensions and the prevalence of valve regurgitation and atrial fibrillation or flutter significantly increased in the group with declines in LVEF. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the group with declines in LVEF than in the group with no decline (39.5% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of decline in LVEF over no decline for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 3.06). When stratified by LVEF at index echocardiography (≥70%, 60% to 69%, and 10% declines in LVEF at 1 year after diagnosis had worse AS-related clinical outcomes than those without declines in LVEF under conservative management. (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Registry; UMIN000012140)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19368798
Volume :
12
Issue :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....87282c16ed5f2ca61dc545ec4b5f685a