Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of 10 serological assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies

Authors :
Sara Gómez de Frutos
Arturo Manuel Fraile Torres
Laura Cardeñoso Domingo
Leticia Fontán García-Rodrigo
Eva Navarro Lara
Ainhoa Gutiérrez-Cobos
Ayla Yarci Carrión
Diego Domingo García
Source :
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2020.

Abstract

Antibody detection is essential to establish exposure, infection, and immunity to SARS-CoV-2, as well as to perform epidemiological studies. The worldwide urge for new diagnostic tools to control the pandemic has led to a quick incorporation in clinical practice of the recently developed serological assays. However, as only few comparative studies have been published, there is a lack of data about the diagnostic accuracy of currently available assays. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy to detect Ig G, Ig M+A, and/or IgA anti SARS-CoV-2 of 10 different assays: lateral flow card immunoassays, 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and 3 chemiluminescent particle immunoassays (CMIA). Using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for COVID-19 as gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were determined. Each assay was tested in 2 groups, namely, positive control, formed by 50 sera from 50 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with positive RT-PCR; and negative control, formed by 50 sera from 50 patients with respiratory infection non-COVID-19. Sensitivity range of the 10 assays evaluated for patients with positive COVID-19 RT-PCR was 40-77% (65-81% considering IgG plus IgM). Specificity ranged 83-100%. VPP and VPN were respectively 81-100% and 61.6-81%. Among the lateral flow immunoassays, the highest sensitivity and specificity results were found in Wondfo® SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test. ELISA IgG and IgA from EUROIMMUN® were the most sensitive ELISA. However, poor results were obtained for isolated detection of IgG. We found similar sensitivity for IgG with SARS-CoV-2 for Architect by Abbott® and ELISA by Vircell®. Results obtained varied widely among the assays evaluated. Due to a better specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy of the assays evaluated was higher in case of positive result. On the other side, lack of antibody detection should be taken with care because of the low sensitivity described. Highest diagnostic accuracy was obtained with ELISA and CMIAs, but they last much longer.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14354373 and 09349723
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8696e3df794ebbbd0d56ba811a9df5be