Back to Search Start Over

Durability of first-line regimens including integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs): data from a real-life setting

Authors :
Antonella d'Arminio Monforte
Alessandro, Cozzi-Lepri
DI BIAGIO, Antonio
Giulia, Marchetti
Sergio Lo Caputo
Stefano, Rusconi
Nicola, Gianotti
Valentina, Mazzotta
Giovanni, Mazzarello
Andrea, Costantini
Antonella, Castagna
Andrea, Antinori
A d'Arminio Monforte
Antinori, A
Andreoni, M
Castagna, A
Castelli, F
Cauda, R
G Di Perri
Galli, M
Iardino, R
Ippolito, G
Lazzarin, A
C Marchetti, G
Rezza, G
F von Schloesser
Viale, P
Ceccherini-Silberstein, F
Cozzi-Lepri, A
Girardi, E
S Lo Caputo
Mussini, C
Puoti, M
F Perno, C
Balotta, C
Bandera, A
Bonora, S
Borderi, M
Calcagno, A
Capetti, A
R Capobianchi, M
Cicalini, S
Cingolani, A
Cinque, P
A De Luca
A Di Biagio
Gianotti, N
Gori, A
Guaraldi, G
Lapadula, G
Lichtner, M
Madeddu, G
Maggiolo, F
Marchetti, G
Monno, L
Nozza, S
Pinnetti, C
E Quiros Roldan
Rossotti, R
Rusconi, S
M Santoro, M
Saracino, A
Sarmati, L
Fanti, I
Galli, L
Lorenzini, P
Rodan(`(o))', A
Macchia, M
Tavelli, A
Carletti, F
Carrara, S
A Di Caro
Graziano, S
Petrone, F
Prota, G
Quartu, S
Truffa, S
Giacometti, A
Costantini, A
Barocci, V
Angarano, G
Fabrizio, C
Suardi, C
Donati, V
Verucchi, G
Castelnuovo, F
Minardi, C
Menzaghi, B
Abeli, C
Cacopardo, B
Celesia, B
Vecchiet, J
Falasca, K
Pan, A
Lorenzotti, S
Sighinolfi, L
Segala, D
Blanc, P
Vichi, F
Cassola, G
Viscoli, C
Alessandrini, A
Bobbio, N
Mazzarello, G
Pozzetto, I
Bonfanti, P
Molteni, C
Chiodera, A
Milini, P
Nunnari, G
Pellican(`(o)), G
Rizzardini, G
Bai, F
C Moioli, M
Piolini, R
L Ridolfo, A
Salpietro, S
Tincati, C
Puzzolante, C
Migliorino, C
Sangiovanni, V
Borgia, G
Esposito, V
F Di Martino
Gentile, I
Maddaloni, L
M Cattelan, A
Marinello, S
Cascio, A
Colomba, C
Baldelli, F
Schiaroli, E
Parruti, G
Sozio, F
Magnani, G
A Ursitti, M
Cristaudo, A
Vullo, V
Acinapura, R
Baldin, G
Capozzi, M
Mondi, A
M Rivano Capparucia
Iaiani, G
Latini, A
Gagliardini, R
M Plazzi, M
Savinelli, S
Vergori, A
Cecchetto, M
Viviani, F
Bagella, P
Rossetti, B
Franco, A
R Fontana Del Vecchio
Francisci, D
C Di Giuli
Caramello, P
C Orofino, G
Sciandra, M
Bassetti, M
Londero, A
Pellizzer, G
Manfrin, V
Starnini, G
A Ialungo and
d'Arminio Monforte, Antonella
Cozzi-Lepri, Alessandro
Di Biagio, Antonio
Marchetti, Giulia
Lo Caputo, Sergio
Rusconi, Stefano
Gianotti, Nicola
Mazzotta, Valentina
Mazzarello, Giovanni
Costantini, Andrea
Castagna, Antonella
Antinori, Andrea
Source :
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 74(5)
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the durability of three integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and two NRTIs in ART-naive individuals. Methods The study design was observational. Patients were HIV-positive, ART-naive subjects starting raltegravir, elvitegravir/cobicistat or dolutegravir with two NRTIs. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure, i.e. occurrence of virological failure (first of two consecutive plasma HIV RNAs ≥200 copies/mL after 24 weeks) or INSTI discontinuation for any reason apart from simplification. Secondary endpoints were INSTI discontinuation due to toxicity/intolerance and CD4 count response. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Results Two thousand and sixteen patients were included: 310 (15.4%) started raltegravir-based regimens, 994 (49.3%) started dolutegravir-based regimens and 712 (35.3%) started elvitegravir/cobicistat-based regimens. Over a median of 11 months, 167 patients experienced treatment failure; the 1 year probability of treatment failure was 6.5% for raltegravir, 5.4% for dolutegravir and 6.7% for elvitegravir/cobicistat (P = 0.001). Sixty-eight patients (3.4%) discontinued INSTIs owing to toxicity/intolerance. By multivariable analysis, patients starting raltegravir had a 2.03-fold (95% CI = 1.2-3.2) higher risk and patients on elvitegravir/cobicistat a 1.88-fold (95% CI = 1.2-2.9) higher risk of treatment failure versus dolutegravir; there was no difference in risk of discontinuation due to toxicity/intolerance when comparing dolutegravir and raltegravir and marginal evidence for a difference when comparing elvitegravir/cobicistat and dolutegravir (adjusted relative hazard = 1.94 for elvitegravir/cobicistat versus dolutegravir, 95% CI = 1.00-3.76, P = 0.05). Conclusions In our real-life setting, INSTI-based regimens showed high potency and durability. Among regimens currently recommended in Europe, those including dolutegravir are associated with a lower risk of treatment failure.

Details

ISSN :
14602091
Volume :
74
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8605bfb3c4183aaca2852e50bdc2ce00