Back to Search Start Over

Time-window relaxations in vehicle routing heuristics

Authors :
Michel Gendreau
Christian Prins
Thibaut Vidal
Teodor Gabriel Crainic
Departamento de Informática = Department of Informatics (PUC-Rio)
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC)
Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur les Réseaux d'Entreprise, la Logistique et le Transport (CIRRELT)
École Polytechnique de Montréal (EPM)-Université de Montréal (UdeM)-HEC Montréal (HEC Montréal)
Laboratoire d'Optimisation des Systèmes Industriels (LOSI)
Institut Charles Delaunay (ICD)
Université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Departamento de Informática (PUC-Rio)
Source :
Journal of Heuristics, Journal of Heuristics, 2015, 21 (3), pp.329-358. ⟨10.1007/s10732-014-9273-y⟩, Journal of Heuristics, Springer Verlag, 2015, 21 (3), pp.329-358. ⟨10.1007/s10732-014-9273-y⟩
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2015.

Abstract

International audience; The contribution of infeasible solutions in heuristic searches for vehicle routing problems (VRP) is not a subject of consensus in the metaheuristics community. Infeasible solutions may allow transitioning between structurally different feasible solutions, thus enhancing the search, but they also lead to more complex move-evaluation procedures and wider search spaces. This paper introduces an experimental assessment of the impact of infeasible solutions on heuristic searches, through various empirical studies on local improvement procedures, iterated local searches, and hybrid genetic algorithms for the VRP with time windows and other related variants with fleet mix, backhauls, and multiple periods. Four relaxation schemes are considered, allowing penalized late arrivals to customers, early and late arrivals, returns in time, or a flexible travel time relaxation. For all considered problems and methods, our experiments demonstrate the significant positive impact of penalized infeasible solution. Differences can also be observed between individual relaxation schemes. The “returns in time” and “flexible travel time” relaxations appear as the best options in terms of solution quality, CPU time, and scalability.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13811231 and 15729397
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Heuristics, Journal of Heuristics, 2015, 21 (3), pp.329-358. ⟨10.1007/s10732-014-9273-y⟩, Journal of Heuristics, Springer Verlag, 2015, 21 (3), pp.329-358. ⟨10.1007/s10732-014-9273-y⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8574ac0920605e3cb07b01083dc71b48