Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 9, p e0183423 (2017)
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background Anticoagulant management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during the pre-endoscopic period has not been fully addressed in American, European, or Asian guidelines. This study sought to evaluate the risks of rebleeding and thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients with acute GIB. Methods Baseline, endoscopy, and outcome data were reviewed for 314 patients with acute GIB: 157 anticoagulant users and 157 age-, sex-, and important risk-matched non-users. Data were also compared between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin users. Results Between anticoagulant users and non-users, of whom 70% underwent early endoscopy, no endoscopy-related adverse events or significant differences were found in the rate of endoscopic therapy need, transfusion need, rebleeding, or thromboembolism. Rebleeding was associated with shock, comorbidities, low platelet count and albumin level, and low-dose aspirin use but not HAS-BLED score, any endoscopic results, heparin bridge, or international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.5. Risks for thromboembolism were INR ≥ 2.5, difference in onset and pre-endoscopic INR, reversal agent use, and anticoagulant interruption but not CHA2DS2-VASc score, any endoscopic results, or heparin bridge. In patients without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption, there was only one rebleeding event and no thromboembolic events. Warfarin users had a significantly higher transfusion need than DOACs users. Conclusion Endoscopy appears to be safe for anticoagulant users with acute GIB compared with non-users. Patient background factors were associated with rebleeding, whereas anticoagulant management factors (e.g. INR correction, reversal agent use, and drug interruption) were associated with thromboembolism. Early intervention without reversal agent use, heparin bridge, or anticoagulant interruption may be warranted for acute GIB.
- Subjects :
- Male
NSAIDs
Anticoagulant Therapy
lcsh:Medicine
Comorbidity
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Antiplatelet Therapy
Vascular Medicine
0302 clinical medicine
Risk Factors
Atrial Fibrillation
Medicine and Health Sciences
030212 general & internal medicine
lcsh:Science
Aspirin
Analgesics
Multidisciplinary
Pharmaceutics
Anticoagulant
Age Factors
Drugs
Heparin
Middle Aged
Cardiovascular Therapy
Treatment Outcome
Anesthesia
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Female
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
medicine.drug
Research Article
medicine.drug_class
Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
Hemorrhage
03 medical and health sciences
Signs and Symptoms
Drug Therapy
INR self-monitoring
Diagnostic Medicine
Thromboembolism
medicine
Humans
International Normalized Ratio
Adverse effect
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Pharmacology
business.industry
lcsh:R
Warfarin
Anticoagulants
Retrospective cohort study
Endoscopy
medicine.disease
Pain management
lcsh:Q
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....850abbab276859c672427b599ee31365