Back to Search Start Over

<scp>Competency‐Based</scp> Assessment Tool for Pediatric Esophagoscopy: International Modified Delphi Consensus

Authors :
Erynne A. Faucett
Nikolaus E. Wolter
Karthik Balakrishnan
Stacey L. Ishman
Deepak Mehta
Sanjay Parikh
Lily H. P. Nguyen
Diego Preciado
Michael J. Rutter
Jeremy D. Prager
Glenn E. Green
Seth M. Pransky
Ravi Elluru
Murad Husein
Soham Roy
Kaalan E. Johnson
Jacob Friedberg
Romaine F. Johnson
Nancy M. Bauman
Charles M. Myer
Ellen S. Deutsch
Eric A. Gantwerker
J. Paul Willging
Catherine K. Hart
Robert H. Chun
Derek J. Lam
Jonathan B. Ida
John J. Manoukian
David R. White
Douglas R. Sidell
Christopher T. Wootten
Andrew F. Inglis
Craig S. Derkay
George Zalzal
David W. Molter
Jeffrey P. Ludemann
Sukgi Choi
Scott Schraff
Robin T. Cotton
Shyan Vijayasekaran
Carlton J. Zdanski
Hamdy El‐Hakim
Udayan K. Shah
Marlene A. Soma
Marshall E. Smith
Dana M. Thompson
Luv Ram Javia
Karen B. Zur
Steven E. Sobol
Christopher J. Hartnick
Reza Rahbar
Jean‐Philippe Vaccani
Benjamin Hartley
Sam J. Daniel
Ian N. Jacobs
Gresham T. Richter
Alessandro Alarcon
Matthew A. Bromwich
Evan J. Propst
Source :
The Laryngoscope. 131:1168-1174
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric esophagoscopy with foreign body removal.Blinded modified Delphi consensus process.Tertiary care center.A list of 25 potential items was sent via the Research Electronic Data Capture database to 66 expert surgeons who perform pediatric esophagoscopy. In the first round, items were rated as &quot;keep&quot; or &quot;remove&quot; and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts rated the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was determined with a goal of 7 to 25 final items.The response rate was 38/64 (59.4%) in the first round and returned questionnaires were 100% complete. Experts wanted to &quot;keep&quot; all items and 172 comments were incorporated. Twenty-four task-specific and 7 previously-validated global rating items were distributed in the second round, and the response rate was 53/64 (82.8%) with questionnaires returned 97.5% complete. Of the task-specific items, 9 reached consensus, 7 were near consensus, and 8 did not achieve consensus. For global rating items that were previously validated, 6 reached consensus and 1 was near consensus.It is possible to reach consensus about the important steps involved in rigid esophagoscopy with foreign body removal using a modified Delphi consensus technique. These items can now be considered when evaluating trainees during this procedure. This tool may allow trainees to focus on important steps of the procedure and help training programs standardize how trainees are evaluated.5. Laryngoscope, 131:1168-1174, 2021.

Details

ISSN :
15314995 and 0023852X
Volume :
131
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Laryngoscope
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....84940cbd9e103615955e4ba1d1da0d0a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29126