Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Sepsis Definitions as Automated Criteria

Authors :
Sean C Yu
Patrick G. Lyons
Albert Lai
Marin H. Kollef
Philip R. O. Payne
Andrew P. Michelson
Kevin D Betthauser
Aditi Gupta
Source :
Critical care medicine. 49(4)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives Assess the impact of heterogeneity among established sepsis criteria (Sepsis-1, Sepsis-3, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1) through the comparison of corresponding sepsis cohorts. Design Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health record. Setting Single, tertiary-care center in St. Louis, MO. Patients Adult, nonsurgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012, and January 6, 2018. Interventions None. Measurements and main results In the electronic health record data, 286,759 encounters met inclusion criteria across the study period. Application of established sepsis criteria yielded cohorts varying in prevalence: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (4.4%), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (4.8%), International Classification of Disease code (7.2%), Sepsis-3 (7.5%), and Sepsis-1 (11.3%). Between the two modern established criteria, Sepsis-3 (n = 21,550) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (n = 12,494), the size of the overlap was 7,763. The sepsis cohorts also varied in time from admission to sepsis onset (hr): Sepsis-1 (2.9), Sepsis-3 (4.1), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (4.6), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (7.6); sepsis discharge International Classification of Disease code rate: Sepsis-1 (37.4%), Sepsis-3 (40.1%), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (48.5%), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (54.5%); and inhospital mortality rate: Sepsis-1 (13.6%), Sepsis-3 (18.8%), International Classification of Disease code (20.4%), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (22.5%), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (24.1%). Conclusions The application of commonly used sepsis definitions on a single population produced sepsis cohorts with low agreement, significantly different baseline demographics, and clinical outcomes.

Details

ISSN :
15300293
Volume :
49
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Critical care medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....845abc3f75041ab0544e83dfd84df8b9