Back to Search
Start Over
Prospects for steady-state scenarios on JET
- Source :
- Litaudon, X, Bizarro, J P S, Challis, C D, Crisanti, F, De Vries, P C, Lomas, P, Rimini, F G, Tala, T, Akers, R, Andrew, Y, Arnoux, G, Artaud, J F, Baranov, Y F, Beurskens, M, Brix, M, Cesario, R, De La Luna, E, Fundamenski, W, Giroud, C, Hawkes, N C, Huber, A, Joffrin, E, Pitts, R A, Rachlew, E, Reyes-Cortes, S D A, Sharapov, S E, Zastrow, K D, Zimmermann, O & contributors, A JET EFDA 2007, ' Prospects for steady-state scenarios on JET ', Nuclear Fusion, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1285-1292 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/027
- Publication Year :
- 2007
-
Abstract
- In the 2006 experimental campaign, progress has been made on JET to operate non-inductive scenarios at higher applied powers (31 MW) and density (n(1) similar to 4 x 10(19) m(-3)), with ITER-relevant safety factor (q(95) similar to 5) and plasma shaping, taking advantage of the new divertor capabilities. The extrapolation of the performance using transport modelling benchmarked on the experimental database indicates that the foreseen power upgrade (similar to 45 MW) will allow the development of non-inductive scenarios where the bootstrap current is maximized together with the fusion yield and not, as in present-day experiments, at its expense. The tools for the long-term JET programme are the new ITER-like ICRH antenna (similar to 15 MW), an upgrade of the NB power (35 MW/20s or 17.5 MW/40s), a new ITER-like first wall, a new pellet injector for edge localized mode control together with improved diagnostic and control capability. Operation with the new wall will set new constraints on non-inductive scenarios that are already addressed experimentally and in the modelling. The fusion performance and driven current that could be reached at high density and power have been estimated using either 0D or 1-1/2D validated transport models. In the high power case (45 MW), the calculations indicate the potential for the operational space of the non-inductive regime to be extended in terms of current (similar to 2.5 MA) and density (n(1) > 5 x 10(19) m(-3)), with high beta(N) (beta(N) > 3.0) and a fraction of the bootstrap current within 60-70% at high toroidal field (similar to 3.5 T).
- Subjects :
- Physics
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Safety factor
DIII-D
Divertor
Nuclear engineering
Extrapolation
fusion reactors
Magnetic confinement fusion
Condensed Matter Physics
Bootstrap current
Nuclear physics
fusion energy
JET
Plasma shaping
ITER
current drive
Edge-localized mode
tokamak
plasma
plasma-wall interactions
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Litaudon, X, Bizarro, J P S, Challis, C D, Crisanti, F, De Vries, P C, Lomas, P, Rimini, F G, Tala, T, Akers, R, Andrew, Y, Arnoux, G, Artaud, J F, Baranov, Y F, Beurskens, M, Brix, M, Cesario, R, De La Luna, E, Fundamenski, W, Giroud, C, Hawkes, N C, Huber, A, Joffrin, E, Pitts, R A, Rachlew, E, Reyes-Cortes, S D A, Sharapov, S E, Zastrow, K D, Zimmermann, O & contributors, A JET EFDA 2007, ' Prospects for steady-state scenarios on JET ', Nuclear Fusion, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1285-1292 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/027
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....844fc092c8eadfa7c4bf5fb66f54659a