Back to Search Start Over

Calibration of Transition-edge Sensor (TES) Bolometer Arrays with Application to CLASS

Authors :
John W. Appel
Charles L. Bennett
Michael K. Brewer
Ricardo Bustos
Manwei Chan
David T. Chuss
Joseph Cleary
Jullianna D. Couto
Sumit Dahal
Rahul Datta
Kevin Denis
Joseph Eimer
Thomas Essinger-Hileman
Kathleen Harrington
Jeffrey Iuliano
Yunyang Li
Tobias A. Marriage
Carolina Núñez
Keisuke Osumi
Ivan L. Padilla
Matthew A. Petroff
Karwan Rostem
Deniz A. N. Valle
Duncan J. Watts
Janet L. Weiland
Edward J. Wollack
Zhilei Xu
Source :
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 262:52
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
American Astronomical Society, 2022.

Abstract

The current and future cosmic microwave background (CMB) experiments fielding kilo-pixel arrays of transition-edge sensor (TES) bolometers require accurate and robust gain calibration methods. We simplify and refactor the standard TES model to directly relate the detector responsivity calibration and optical time constant to the measured TES current $I$ and the applied bias current $I_{\mathrm{b}}$. The calibration method developed for the Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor (CLASS) TES bolometer arrays relies on current versus voltage ($I$-$V$) measurements acquired daily prior to CMB observations. By binning Q-band (40GHz) $I$-$V$ measurements by optical loading, we find that the gain calibration median standard error within a bin is 0.3%. We test the accuracy of this "$I$-$V$ bin" detector calibration method by using the Moon as a photometric standard. The ratio of measured Moon amplitudes between detector pairs sharing the same feedhorn indicates a TES calibration error of 0.5%. We also find that for the CLASS Q-band TES array, calibrating the response of individual detectors based solely on the applied TES bias current accurately corrects TES gain variations across time but introduces a bias in the TES calibration from data counts to power units. Since the TES current bias value is set and recorded before every observation, this calibration method can always be applied to raw TES data and is not subject to $I$-$V$ data quality or processing errors.<br />Comment: 19 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables. Submitted to ApJS May 2022. Published ApJS Oct 2022

Details

ISSN :
15384365 and 00670049
Volume :
262
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8441ac0da134dfb45ad2795d58e1ff60