Back to Search Start Over

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: discography for patient selection

Authors :
Andrew T. Dailey
Praveen V. Mummaneni
William C. Watters
Jeffrey C. Wang
Daniel K. Resnick
Michael G. Kaiser
Tanvir F. Choudhri
Sanjay S. Dhall
Zoher Ghogawala
Michael W. Groff
Alok D. Sharan
Jason C. Eck
Source :
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine. 21(1)
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Identifying the etiology of pain for patients suffering from chronic low-back pain remains problematic. Noninvasive imaging modalities, used in isolation, have not consistently provided sufficient evidence to support performance of a lumbar fusion. Provocative testing has been used as an adjunct in this assessment, either alone or in combination with other modalities, to enhance the diagnostic capabilities when evaluating patients with low-back pain. There have been a limited number of studies investigating this topic since the publication of the original guidelines. Based primarily on retrospective studies, discography, as a stand-alone test, is not recommended to formulate treatment strategies for patients with low-back pain. A single randomized cohort study demonstrated an improved potential of discoblock over discography as a predictor of success following lumbar fusion. It is therefore recommended that discoblock be considered as a diagnostic option. There is a possibility, based on a matched cohort study, that an association exists between progression of degenerative disc disease and the performance of a provocative discogram. It is therefore recommended that patients be counseled regarding this potential development prior to undergoing discography.

Details

ISSN :
15475646
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....844153b94de3004f973a93294331a772