Back to Search Start Over

Direct contact ultrasound assisted freezing of chicken breast samples

Authors :
Leire Astráin-Redín
Bente Kirkhus
Guillermo Cebrián
Ignacio Álvarez
Anne Rieder
J. Abad
Javier Raso
Source :
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Ultrasonics sonochemistry, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol 70, Iss, Pp 105319-(2021)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Graphical abstract<br />Highlights • Application of US (37% net sonication time; 40 kHz; 50 W) reduced 11% the effective freezing time of chicken meat samples. • Application of US (40 kHz, 50 W) reduced the length of all the phases of the freezing curve. • No difference in WHC, CL and protein digestibility between US-assisted and non-US-assisted frozen samples was found.<br />Nowadays, rapid freezing is sought to favor the formation of small ice crystals. Several studies have shown that the application of ultrasounds (US) accelerates the processes of energy and mass transfer when they are applied through immersion systems. However, there are hardly any studies on its application in direct systems without the use of a liquid medium for its transmission. Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate the potential of the application of US for improving the freezing process of chicken breast samples. First, the application of intermittent US treatments at different net sonication times of 7, 17, 37, 50 and 67% during the freezing of distilled water samples in a conventional freezer was evaluated. It was observed that net sonication times of 37, 50 and 67% reduced the phase change period by 30.0, 21.4, 27.0%, respectively. The effective freezing time was also reduced by 12.4 and 12.8% by applying net sonication times of 37 and 50%. Considering these results, an intermittent US treatment with a net sonication time of 37% was chosen for chicken breast freezing in an air-forced cooling tunnel at ambient temperatures from −13 to −22 °C. The length of all the freezing phases was reduced upon application of US, leading to an overall process time reduction of approx. 11%. On the other hand, no significant differences were found either in the Water Holding Capacity (WHC) or Cooking Loss (CL) values between control and US assisted frozen chicken breast samples. Furthermore, in vitro experiments showed that US-assisted freezing did not influence protein digestibility of chicken meat samples. This study demonstrates the potential of the application of US by direct contact to favor energy transfer processes during freezing of water and chicken breasts samples. However, its effect on the quality of the frozen products should be further studied.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18732828 and 13504177
Volume :
70
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....83f9dcde78634817143d4681ccc78a4d