Back to Search Start Over

Leaching of electrodic powders from lithium ion batteries: Optimization of operating conditions and effect of physical pretreatment for waste fraction retrieval

Authors :
Francesca Pagnanelli
Emanuela Moscardini
Pietro Altimari
Luigi Toro
Thomas Abo Atia
Source :
Waste Management. 60:706-715
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

Experimental results of leaching tests using waste fractions obtained by mechanical pretreatment of lithium ion batteries (LIB) were reported. Two physical pretreatments were performed at pilot scale in order to recover electrodic powders: the first including crushing, milling, and sieving and the second granulation, and sieving. Recovery yield of electrodic powder was significantly influenced by the type of pretreatment. About 50% of initial LIB wastes was recovered by the first treatment (as electrodic powder with size0.5mm, Sample 1), while only 37% of powder with size1mm (Sample 2) can be recovered by the second treatment. Chemical digestion put in evidence the heterogeneity of recovered powders denoting different amounts of Co, Mn, and Ni. Leaching tests of both powders were performed in order to determine optimized conditions for metal extraction. Solid/liquid ratios and sulfuric acid concentrations were changed according to factorial designs at constant temperature (80°C). Optimized conditions for quantitative extraction (99%) of Co and Li from Sample 1 are 1/10g/mL as solid/liquid ratio and +50% stoichiometric excess of acid (1.1M). Using the same solid/liquid ratio, +100% acid excess (1.2M) is necessary to extract 96% of Co and 86% of Li from Sample 2. Best conditions for leaching of Sample 2 using glucose are +200% acid excess (1.7M) and 0.05M glucose concentration. Optimized conditions found in this work are among the most effective reported in the literature in term of Co extraction and reagent consumption.

Details

ISSN :
0956053X
Volume :
60
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Waste Management
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....83a71355c91246a0f65624a63cc81468
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.037