Back to Search Start Over

The single-jet inclusive cross-section and its definition

Authors :
Giovanni Stagnitto
Matteo Cacciari
Davide Napoletano
Gregory Soyez
Stefano Forte
Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies (LPTHE)
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institut de Physique Théorique - UMR CNRS 3681 (IPHT)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Cacciari, M
Forte, S
Napoletano, D
Soyez, G
Stagnitto, G
Source :
Phys.Rev.D, Phys.Rev.D, 2019, 100 (11), pp.114015. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114015⟩, Physical Review D, Physical Review D, American Physical Society, 2019, 100 (11), pp.114015. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114015⟩, Physical Review
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
arXiv, 2019.

Abstract

We investigate some well-known problematic aspects of the single-jet inclusive cross-section, specifically its non-unitarity and the possibly related issue of apparent perturbative instability at low orders. We study and clarify their origin by introducing possible alternative weighted definitions of the observable which restore unitarity. We show that the perturbative instability of the standard definition is an accidental artefact of the smallness of the NLO $K$ factor which only manifests itself for values of the jet radius in the range $R\sim 0.3-0.6$, and that its non-unitarity is necessary in order to ensure cancellation of logs of the momentum cutoff used in the jet definition. We also show that alternative unitary definitions do not have better perturbative properties compared to the conventional non-unitary definition, while suffering from lack of cancellation of large logs.<br />Comment: 19 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication on PRD

Details

ISSN :
15507998 and 15502368
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Phys.Rev.D, Phys.Rev.D, 2019, 100 (11), pp.114015. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114015⟩, Physical Review D, Physical Review D, American Physical Society, 2019, 100 (11), pp.114015. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114015⟩, Physical Review
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....838600379b915d8ca03e0a76a9a98034
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1906.11850