Back to Search Start Over

Hospital Improvement in Time to Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1999 to 2002

Authors :
Martha Blaney
Edward L. Portnay
Yongfei Wang
Jeph Herrin
Harlan M. Krumholz
David J. Magid
Jeptha P. Curtis
Elizabeth H. Bradley
Robert L. McNamara
Nrmi Investigators
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 47:45-51
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to analyze recent trends in door-to-reperfusion time and to identify hospital characteristics associated with improved performance. BACKGROUND Rapid reperfusion improves survival for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS In this retrospective observational study from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3 and -4, between 1999 and 2002, we analyzed door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times in patients admitted with STEMI and receiving fibrinolytic therapy (n = 68,439 patients in 1,015 hospitals) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 33,647 patients in 421 hospitals) within 6 h of hospital arrival. RESULTS In 1999, only 46% of the patients in the fibrinolytic therapy cohort were treated within the recommended 30-min door-to-needle time; only 35% of the patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention cohort were treated within the recommended 90-min door-to-balloon time. Improvement in these times to reperfusion over the four-year study period was not statistically significant (door-to-needle: -0.01 min/year, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.24 to +0.23, p > 0.9; door-to-balloon: -0.57 min/year, 95% CI -1.24 to +0.10, p = 0.09). Only 33% (337 of 1,015) of hospitals improved door-to-needle time by more than one min/year, and 26% (110 of 421) improved door-to-balloon time by more than three min/year. No hospital characteristic was significantly associated with improvement in door-to-needle time. Only high annual percutaneous coronary intervention volume and location in New England were significantly associated with greater improvement in door-to-balloon time. CONCLUSIONS Fewer than one-half of patients with STEMI receive reperfusion in the recommended door-to-needle or door-to-balloon time, and mean time to reperfusion has not decreased significantly in recent years. Relatively few hospitals have shown substantial improvement.

Details

ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
47
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....82de7c22bc19d9b70192bf66725d859d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.071