Back to Search
Start Over
Effect of oropharyngeal povidone-iodine preventive oral care on ventilator-associated pneumonia in severely brain-injured or cerebral hemorrhage patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
- Source :
- Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, 2014, 42 (1), pp.1-8. ⟨10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2770f⟩, Critical Care Medicine, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2014, 42 (1), pp.1-8. ⟨10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2770f⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2014.
-
Abstract
- International audience; OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral care with povidone-iodine on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a high-risk population. DESIGN: A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, two-parallel-group trial performed between May 2008 and May 2011. SETTING: Six ICUs in France. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-nine severely brain-injured patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) or cerebral hemorrhage expected to be mechanically ventilated for more than 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive oropharyngeal care with povidone-iodine (n = 91) or placebo (n = 88) six times daily until mechanical ventilation withdrawal. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary endpoint was the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Secondary endpoint included the rates of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome and patient's outcome. The number of patients evaluable for the primary endpoint (preplanned modified intention-to-treat population) was 150 (78 in the povidone-iodine group, 72 in the placebo group). Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurred in 24 patients (31%) in the povidone-iodine group and 20 (28%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.67-1.82]; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the two groups for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: eight patients (10%) in the povidone-iodine group and five patients (7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.51-4.31]; p = 0.47). Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in five patients in the povidone-iodine group but not in the placebo group (p = 0.06). There was no difference between groups for ICU and hospital lengths of stay, as well as ICU and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to recommend oral care with povidone-iodine to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in high-risk patients. Furthermore, this strategy seems to increase the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
povidone-iodine
Population
Oropharynx
intensive care medicine
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Placebo
03 medical and health sciences
ventilator-associated pneumonia
0302 clinical medicine
Double-Blind Method
prevention
Internal medicine
Intensive care
medicine
Clinical endpoint
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
education
Cerebral Hemorrhage
Mechanical ventilation
education.field_of_study
business.industry
oral care
Respiratory disease
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
[SDV.MHEP.HEG]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Hépatology and Gastroenterology
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Respiration, Artificial
3. Good health
Surgery
Intensive Care Units
Pneumonia
Brain Injuries
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00903493 and 15300293
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, 2014, 42 (1), pp.1-8. ⟨10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2770f⟩, Critical Care Medicine, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2014, 42 (1), pp.1-8. ⟨10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2770f⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8247a6a740c8d62d014c5bcefcc177ac
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2770f⟩