Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Higher Spatial Atmospheric Resolution on Precipitation Extremes Over Land in Global Climate Models

Authors :
Dian Putrasahan
Julien Boé
Laurent Terray
A. Baker
Christopher D. Roberts
Retish Senan
Reinhard Schiemann
Rein Haarsma
Lisa V. Alexander
Malcolm J. Roberts
Alessio Bellucci
Enrico Scoccimarro
Torben Koenigk
Sophie Valcke
Marie-Pierre Moine
Benoit Vanniere
Jon Seddon
Margot Bador
Katja Lohmann
Climate Change Research Centre [Sydney] (CCRC)
University of New South Wales [Sydney] (UNSW)
CERFACS [Toulouse]
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Department of Meteorology [Reading]
University of Reading (UOR)
Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici [Bologna] (CMCC)
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI)
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie (MPI-M)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
NCAS-Climate [Reading]
University of Reading (UOR)-University of Reading (UOR)
CECI, CERFACS / CNRS (CECI)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Laboratoire de Mécanique, Modélisation et Procédés Propres (M2P2)
Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique (CERFACS)
CERFACS
Source :
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 125 (13), pp.e2019JD032184. ⟨10.1029/2019JD032184⟩, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 125 (13), ⟨10.1029/2019JD032184⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; Finer grids in global climate models could lead to an improvement in the simulation of precipitation extremes. We assess the influence on model performance of increasing spatial resolution by evaluating pairs of high-and low-resolution forced atmospheric simulations from six global climate models (generally the latest CMIP6 version) on a common 1°× 1°grid. The differences in tuning between the lower and higher resolution versions are as limited as possible, which allows the influence of higher resolution to be assessed exclusively. We focus on the 1985-2014 climatology of annual extremes of daily precipitation over global land, and models are compared to observations from different sources (i.e., in situ-based and satellite-based) to enable consideration of observational uncertainty. Finally, we address regional features of model performance based on four indices characterizing different aspects of precipitation extremes. Our analysis highlights good agreement between models that precipitation extremes are more intense at higher resolution. We find that the spread among observations is substantial and can be as large as intermodel differences, which makes the quantitative evaluation of model performance difficult. However, consistently across the four precipitation extremes indices that we investigate, models often show lower skill at higher resolution compared to their corresponding lower resolution version. Our findings suggest that increasing spatial resolution alone is not sufficient to obtain a systematic improvement in the simulation of precipitation extremes, and other improvements (e.g., physics and tuning) may be required.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2169897X and 21698996
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 125 (13), pp.e2019JD032184. ⟨10.1029/2019JD032184⟩, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 125 (13), ⟨10.1029/2019JD032184⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....81ee570f2f759ed027c71133a1e78c49
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032184⟩