Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating the use of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool in mental health services

Authors :
Kinga Bugajska
Rob Brooks
Source :
British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 84:591-600
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, 2020.

Abstract

Introduction While the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool has undergone psychometric development and testing and is widely used in mental health practice, only a few small-scale studies to date have examined its use in clinical practice. Method A national survey was conducted with United Kingdom occupational therapists working in mental health settings to evaluate the use of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool. The survey included the modified version of the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire and two open-ended questions. The latter were coded through inductive content analysis and all responses were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Results n=105 questionnaires were analysed. The Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool was found to be a useful tool, with most therapists scoring it favourably on the usefulness (74.7%), ease of use (76.1%), ease of learning (81.2%) and satisfaction (80.6%) subscales. It was praised as a valuable outcome measure, guiding interventions and providing a comprehensive overview of assessed individuals. Time consumption, inaccessible terminology and lack of sensitivity to change were indicated as possible downfalls. Conclusion Therapists valued the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool as an assessment tool, but more importance should be placed on training to overcome some of the limitations identified here. Also, its suitability to the setting in which it is used should be considered before implementation in practice.

Details

ISSN :
14776006 and 03080226
Volume :
84
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....81ab6dcfd9e40b97583e07e2aaf1f35d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022620956580