Back to Search Start Over

L1CAM in Early-Stage Type I Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Large Multicenter Evaluation

Authors :
Ulla Puistola
Léon C van Kempen
Samira Abdel Azim
Uwe Schirmer
Frédéric Amant
Johan Bulten
Alexandra Meuter
Stephan Polterauer
Elisabeth Müller-Holzner
Elisa Lappi-Blanco
Alon Ben-Arie
Stephan W Jahn
Staci Tanouye
Andrea Mariani
Peter Oppelt
Leon F.A.G. Massuger
Alain G. Zeimet
Monika Stroh-Weigert
Monica Huszar
Mina Fogel
Ignace Vergote
Peter Altevogt
Daniel Reimer
Christian Marth
Yvette P. Geels
Boris Winterhoff
Michael Netzer
Alexander Reinthaller
Werner O. Hackl
Edgar Petru
Other departments
Source :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 1142-1150, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 15, pp. 1142-1150, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105(15), 1142-1150. Oxford University Press
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2013.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 124525.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Despite the excellent prognosis of Federation Internationale de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique (FIGO) stage I, type I endometrial cancers, a substantial number of patients experience recurrence and die from this disease. We analyzed the value of immunohistochemical L1CAM determination to predict clinical outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study to determine expression of L1CAM by immunohistochemistry in 1021 endometrial cancer specimens. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were applied for survival and multivariable analyses. A machine-learning approach was used to validate variables for predicting recurrence and death. RESULTS: Of 1021 included cancers, 17.7% were rated L1CAM-positive. Of these L1CAM-positive cancers, 51.4% recurred during follow-up compared with 2.9% L1CAM-negative cancers. Patients bearing L1CAM-positive cancers had poorer disease-free and overall survival (two-sided Log-rank P < .001). Multivariable analyses revealed an increase in the likelihood of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 16.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.55 to 25.28) and death (HR = 15.01; 95% CI = 9.28 to 24.26). In the L1CAM-negative cancers FIGO stage I subdivision, grading and risk assessment were irrelevant for predicting disease-free and overall survival. The prognostic relevance of these parameters was related strictly to L1CAM positivity. A classification and regression decision tree (CRT)identified L1CAM as the best variable for predicting recurrence (sensitivity = 0.74; specificity = 0.91) and death (sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, L1CAM has been shown to be the best-ever published prognostic factor in FIGO stage I, type I endometrial cancers and shows clear superiority over the standardly used multifactor risk score. L1CAM expression in type I cancers indicates the need for adjuvant treatment. This adhesion molecule might serve as a treatment target for the fully humanized anti-L1CAM antibody currently under development for clinical use.

Details

ISSN :
14602105, 00278874, and 11421150
Volume :
105
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....81a5fae2d940876bfb3c17dee5d47d8d