Eyes wide shut: How visual cues affect brain patterns of simulated gait

In the last 20 years, motor imagery (MI) has been extensively used to train motor abilities in sport and in rehabilitation. However, MI procedures are not all alike as much as their potential beneficiaries. Here we assessed whether the addition of visual cues could make MI performance more comparable with explicit motor performance in gait tasks. With fMRI we also explored the neural correlates of these experimental manipulations. We did this in elderly subjects who are known to rely less on kinesthetic information while favoring visual strategies during motor performance. Contrary to expectations, we found that the temporal coupling between execution and imagery times, an index of the quality of MI, was less precise when participants were allowed to visually explore the environment. While the brain activation patterns of the gait motor circuits were very similar in both an open‐eyed and eye‐shut virtual walking MI task, these differed for a vast temporo‐occipito‐parietal additional activation for open‐eyed MI. Crucially, the higher was the activity in this posterior network, the less accurate was the MI performance with eyes open at a clinical test of gait. We conclude that both visually‐cued and internally‐cued MI are associated with the neurofunctional activation of a gait specific motor system. The less precise behavioral coupling between imagined and executed gait while keeping eyes open may be attributed to the processing load implied in visual monitoring and scanning of the environment. The implications of these observations for rehabilitation of gait with MI are discussed.
Here we investigated whether the addition of visual cues could make motor imagery (MI) performance more comparable with explicit motor execution in gait tasks at the behavioural and neurofunctional level. The MI quality was lower when participants were allowed to visually explore the environment. Brain activation patterns of the gait motor circuits were very similar in both an open‐eyed and eye‐shut virtual walking MI task. These differed for a vast temporo‐occipito‐parietal additional activation for open‐eyed MI. We conclude that both visually‐cued and internally‐cued MI are associated with the neurofunctional activation of a gait specific motor system; however, the lower MI quality while keeping eyes open may be attributed to the processing load implied in visual monitoring and scanning of the environment.