Back to Search
Start Over
Assessing the feasibility of Nipah vaccine efficacy trials based on previous outbreaks in Bangladesh
- Source :
- Vaccine, Vaccine, 2021, pp.In Press, Corrected Proof. ⟨10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.027⟩, Vaccine, Elsevier, 2021, pp.In Press, Corrected Proof. ⟨10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.027⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2021.
-
Abstract
- BackgroundNipah virus (NiV) is an emerging, bat-borne pathogen that can be transmitted from person-to-person. Vaccines are currently being developed for NiV, and studies funded to evaluate their safety and immunogenicity, so that they could possibly be used to contain outbreaks. An important unanswered question is whether it will be possible to evaluate the efficacy of vaccine candidates in phase III clinical trials in a context where spillovers from the zoonotic reservoir are infrequent and associated with small outbreaks. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of conducting a phase III vaccine trial in Bangladesh, the only country reporting regularly NiV cases.MethodsWe used simulations based on previously observed NiV cases from Bangladesh, an assumed vaccine efficacy of 90% and other NiV vaccine target characteristics, to compare three vaccination study designs: (i) cluster randomized ring vaccination, (ii) cluster randomized mass vaccination, and (iii) an observational case-control study design.ResultsThe simulations showed that, assuming a ramp-up period of 10 days and a mean hospitalization delay of 4 days, it would take 516 years and over 163,000 vaccine doses to run a ring vaccination trial under current epidemic conditions. A cluster-randomized trial in the two most affected districts would take 81 years and 2.3 million vaccine doses. An observational case-control design in these two districts would require seven years and 2.5 million vaccine doses.DiscussionWithout a change in the epidemiology of NiV, ring vaccination or cluster-randomized trials are unlikely to be completed within a reasonable time window. In this light, the remaining options are: (i) not conducting a phase III trial until the epidemiology of NiV changes, (ii) identifying alternative ways to licensure such as observational studies or controlled studies in animals such as in the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Animal Rule.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
030231 tropical medicine
Context (language use)
Nipah virus
Disease cluster
Disease Outbreaks
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
[MATH.MATH-ST]Mathematics [math]/Statistics [math.ST]
Epidemiology
medicine
Animals
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
030304 developmental biology
0303 health sciences
Bangladesh
Vaccines
General Veterinary
General Immunology and Microbiology
business.industry
vaccine trial
Clinical study design
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Vaccine trial
Vaccine efficacy
3. Good health
Vaccination
Infectious Diseases
Case-Control Studies
Emergency medicine
Molecular Medicine
Feasibility Studies
Observational study
Emerging pathogens
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0264410X
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Vaccine, Vaccine, 2021, pp.In Press, Corrected Proof. ⟨10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.027⟩, Vaccine, Elsevier, 2021, pp.In Press, Corrected Proof. ⟨10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.027⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....80eeadc39755f81f368173d14d888400
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.027⟩