Back to Search
Start Over
Indacaterol-Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol-Fluticasone for COPD
- Source :
- New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016, 374 (23), pp.2222-2234. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1516385⟩, New England Journal of Medicine, 2016, 374 (23), pp.2222-2234. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1516385⟩, FLAME Investigators & Bødtger, U 2016, ' Indacaterol–Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol–Fluticasone for COPD ', The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 374, no. 23, pp. 2222-2234 . https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1516385
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC, 2016.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Most guidelines recommend either a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) plus an inhaled glucocorticoid or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) as the first-choice treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have a high risk of exacerbations. The role of treatment with a LABA-LAMA regimen in these patients is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial. Patients who had COPD with a history of at least one exacerbation during the previous year were randomly assigned to receive, by inhalation, either the LABA indacaterol (110 μg) plus the LAMA glycopyrronium (50 μg) once daily or the LABA salmeterol (50 μg) plus the inhaled glucocorticoid fluticasone (500 μg) twice daily. The primary outcome was the annual rate of all COPD exacerbations. RESULTS: A total of 1680 patients were assigned to the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group, and 1682 to the salmeterol-fluticasone group. Indacaterol-glycopyrronium showed notonly noninferiority but also superiority to salmeterol-fluticasone in reducing the annual rate of all COPD exacerbations; the rate was 11% lower in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (3.59 vs. 4.03; rate ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.96; P=0.003). The indacaterol-glycopyrronium group had a longer time to the first exacerbation than did the salmeterol-fluticasone group (71 days [95% CI, 60 to 82] vs. 51 days [95% CI, 46 to 57]; hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.91], representing a 16% lower risk; P
- Subjects :
- Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use
Male
Exacerbation
Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination/adverse effects
Quinolones
Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use
law.invention
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use
030212 general & internal medicine
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Fluticasone
Medicine(all)
COPD
Glycopyrrolate/adverse effects
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy
3. Good health
Drug Combinations
Anesthesia
Indans
Female
Salmeterol
hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists
medicine.drug
Indans/adverse effects
Muscarinic Antagonists
03 medical and health sciences
QUINOLONES
Double-Blind Method
Administration, Inhalation
medicine
Humans
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
Glucocorticoids
Aged
Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination
Quinolones/adverse effects
business.industry
medicine.disease
Glycopyrrolate
Regimen
030228 respiratory system
Fluticasone Propionate, Salmeterol Xinafoate Drug Combination
Indacaterol
business
[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00284793 and 15334406
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016, 374 (23), pp.2222-2234. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1516385⟩, New England Journal of Medicine, 2016, 374 (23), pp.2222-2234. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1516385⟩, FLAME Investigators & Bødtger, U 2016, ' Indacaterol–Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol–Fluticasone for COPD ', The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 374, no. 23, pp. 2222-2234 . https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1516385
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7fe4acaa29c8e8cb8f5ca38a6085fe52
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1516385⟩