Back to Search Start Over

Effects of the entrance channel and fission barrier in the synthesis of superheavy elementZ=120

Authors :
Avazbek Nasirov
Giuseppe Mandaglio
G. Giardina
A. I. Muminov
A. Sobiczewski
Source :
Physical Review C. 84
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
American Physical Society (APS), 2011.

Abstract

The fusion and evaporation residue cross sections for the ${}^{50}$Ti${+}^{249}$Cf and ${}^{54}$Cr${+}^{248}$Cm reactions calculated by the combined dinuclear system and advanced statistical models are compared. These reactions are considered to be used to synthesize the heaviest superheavy element. The ${}^{50}$Ti${+}^{249}$Cf reaction is more mass asymmetric than ${}^{54}$Cr${+}^{248}$Cm, and the fusion excitation function for the former reaction is higher than the one for the latter reaction. The evaporation residue excitation functions for the mass asymmetric reaction is higher in comparison with the one for the ${}^{54}$Cr${+}^{248}$Cm reaction. The use of the mass values of superheavy nuclei calculated in the framework of the macroscopic-microscopic model by the Warsaw Group [Muntian, Z. Patyk, and A. Sobiczewski, Phys. At. Nuclei 66, 1015 (2003)] leads to a smaller evaporation residue cross section for both the reactions in comparison with the case of using the masses calculated by M\"oller and Nix [J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 20, 1681 (1994)]. The ${}^{50}$Ti${+}^{249}$Cf reaction is more favorable in comparison with the ${}^{54}$Cr${+}^{248}$Cm reaction: the maximum values of the excitation function of the 3$n$ channel of the evaporation residue formation for the ${}^{50}$Ti${+}^{249}$Cf and ${}^{54}$Cr${+}^{248}$Cm reactions are about 0.1 and 0.07 pb, respectively, but the yield of the 4$n$ channel for the former reaction is lower (0.004 pb) in comparison with the one (0.01 pb) for the latter reaction.

Details

ISSN :
1089490X and 05562813
Volume :
84
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physical Review C
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7f98c2f4280191be6f3c3c0594146676
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.84.044612