Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy and reproducibility of the Etest to detect drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae to contemporary treatment

Authors :
John R. Papp
Dapne Ware
Lillian V. Lee
Marie Claire Rowlinson
Peter C. Iwen
Norman P. O’Connor
Jafar H. Razeq
Anita Glennen
Celia Hagan
Jason Wholehan
Source :
Journal of Medical Microbiology. 67:68-73
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Microbiology Society, 2018.

Abstract

PURPOSE. Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen that continues to evolve to become resistant to known antibiotics. In preparing for potential emergence, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that clinical laboratories maintain or develop protocols to assess antibiotic susceptibly for this organism. This study examines the intra-laboratory variability of using the Etest method to provide consistent MIC values for N. gonorrhoeae and also compared the results of the Etest to known agar dilution MIC values. METHODOLOGY. Clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates, 100 paired duplicates, were tested by eight laboratories for antibiotic susceptibility to ceftriaxone, cefixime and azithromycin using Etest strips. RESULTS/KEY FINDINGS. Overall, >80 % of the paired Etest MIC values were within one log(2) dilution of the replicate. When compared to the agar dilution reference method, the cefixime Etest MIC values were consistently underreported by one dilution (seven laboratories) or two dilutions (one laboratory). The azithromycin Etest MIC values agreed 90.7 % with the agar dilution MIC values while the agreement with ceftriaxone was 90.9 %. CONCLUSION. Overall, the Etest method yielded reproducible MIC values within each laboratory with the azithromycin and ceftriaxone MIC results consistent to the reference agar dilution method while the cefixime result tended to provide a lower MIC value.

Details

ISSN :
14735644 and 00222615
Volume :
67
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7f9343e322f37f1cbec461fb530da4b2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000651