Back to Search Start Over

Climate Extreme Versus Carbon Extreme: Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Temperature and Precipitation

Authors :
Katja Frieler
Sebastian Ostberg
Jia Yang
Kazuya Nishina
Christopher P. O. Reyer
Thomas Hickler
Louis François
Hao Shi
Akihiko Ito
Philippe Ciais
Jinfeng Chang
Shufen Pan
Sibyll Schaphoff
Fang Zhao
Hanqin Tian
Jörg Steinkamp
Bojie Fu
Auburn University (AU)
Mississippi State University [Mississippi]
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS)
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
ICOS-ATC (ICOS-ATC)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Université de Liège
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F)
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main-Senckenberg – Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research - Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
Leibniz Association-Leibniz Association
National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Source :
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2020, 125 (4), pp.e2019JG005252. ⟨10.1029/2019JG005252⟩, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 125 (4), pp.e2019JG005252. ⟨10.1029/2019JG005252⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; Carbon fluxes at the land-atmosphere interface are strongly influenced by weather and climate conditions. Yet what is usually known as “climate extremes” does not always translate into very high or low carbon fluxes or so-called “carbon extremes.” To reveal the patterns of how climate extremes influence terrestrial carbon fluxes, we analyzed the interannual variations in ecosystem carbon fluxes simulated by the Terrestrial Biosphere Models (TBMs) in the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. At the global level, TBMs simulated reduced ecosystem net primary productivity (NPP; 18.5 ± 9.3 g C m−2 yr−1), but enhanced heterotrophic respiration (Rh; 7 ± 4.6 g C m−2 yr−1) during extremely hot events. TBMs also simulated reduced NPP (60.9 ± 24.4 g C m−2 yr−1) and reduced Rh (16.5 ± 11.4 g C m−2 yr−1) during extreme dry events. Influences of precipitation extremes on terrestrial carbon uptake were larger in the arid/semiarid zones than other regions. During hot extremes, ecosystems in the low latitudes experienced a larger reduction in carbon uptake. However, a large fraction of carbon extremes did not occur in concert with either temperature or precipitation extremes. Rather these carbon extremes are likely to be caused by the interactive effects of the concurrent temperature and precipitation anomalies. The interactive effects showed considerable spatial variations with the largest effects on NPP in South America and Africa. Additionally, TBMs simulated a stronger sensitivity of ecosystem productivity to precipitation than satellite estimates. This study provides new insights into the complex ecosystem responses to climate extremes, especially the emergent properties of carbon dynamics resulting from compound climate extremes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21698953
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2020, 125 (4), pp.e2019JG005252. ⟨10.1029/2019JG005252⟩, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 125 (4), pp.e2019JG005252. ⟨10.1029/2019JG005252⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7f8fb25960397fb727722bd0b14a3012
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005252⟩