Outcomes in emergency versus electively scheduled cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorder managed by cesarean‐hysterectomy within a multidisciplinary care team

Compare maternal and perinatal outcomes between emergency and electively scheduled cesarean-hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.Single-center retrospective cohort study including 125 cases of antenatally suspected and pathologically confirmed PAS disorders. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test associations. Survival curves exploring risk factors for emergency birth were sought.25 (20%) and 100 (80%) patients had emergency and electively scheduled birth, respectively. Emergency birth had a higher estimated blood loss (2772 [2256.75] vs. 1561.19 [1152.95], P 0.001), with a higher rate of coagulopathy (40% vs. 6%; P 0.001) and bladder injury (44% vs. 13%; P 0.001); and was associated with increased rates of blood transfusion (aOR 4.9, CI95% 1.3-17.5, P = 0.01), coagulopathy (aOR 16.4, CI95% 2.6-101.4, P = 0.002) and urinary tract injury (aOR 6.96, CI95% 1.5-30.7, P = 0.01). Gestational age at birth was lower in the emergency group (31.55 [4.75] vs. 35.19 [2.77], P = 0.001), no difference in perinatal mortality was found. A sonographically short cervix and/or history of APH had an increased cumulative risk of emergency birth with advancing gestational age.Patients with PAS disorders managed in a tertiary center by a multidisciplinary team requiring emergency birth have increased maternal morbidity and poorer perinatal outcomes than those with electively scheduled birth.