Back to Search Start Over

How reproducible should research software be?

Authors :
Harrison, Sam
Dasgupta, Abhishek
Waldman, Simon
Henderson, Alex
Lovell, Christopher
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Zenodo, 2021.

Abstract

In this article, we attempt to answer the question of how reproducible research software should be by defining four levels of reproducibility, suggesting criteria to help you decide which level your research software should be at, and recommending practices to reach these levels of reproducibility. The article is the result of a discussion session at the Software Sustainability Institute Fellows Online Selection Day 2021.<br />{"references":["Wilson et al (2017). Good enough practices in scientific computing. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510","Lee et al (2021). Barely sufficient practices in scientific computing. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100206","McArthur (2019). Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Replicability: Tackling the 3R challenge in biointerface science and engineering. doi: 10.1116/1.5093621"]}

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7ed0a2bd7d36d91a0d61ce1c069ea096
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4761867