Back to Search Start Over

An updated visual orbit of the directly imaged exoplanet 51 Eridani b and prospects for a dynamical mass measurement with Gaia

Authors :
Sloane Wiktorowicz
Marshall D. Perrin
Laurent Pueyo
Bin Ren
Melisa Tallis
Jean-Baptiste Ruffio
Pascale Hibon
Rémi Soummer
James E. Larkin
Jason J. Wang
Inseok Song
Jérôme Maire
Benjamin L. Gerard
Bruce Macintosh
Justin Hom
Fredrik T. Rantakyrö
Gaspard Duchêne
Julien Rameau
Abhijith Rajan
Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer
David Palmer
Dmitry Savransky
Anand Sivaramakrishnan
Lisa Poyneer
Eric L. Nielsen
Quinn Konopacky
Franck Marchis
Robert J. De Rosa
Christian Marois
Stephen J. Goodsell
Schuyler Wolff
J. Kent Wallace
Jeffrey Chilcote
James R. Graham
J. Bulger
Katherine B. Follette
Patrick Ingraham
Jennifer Patience
Tara Cotten
Sandrine Thomas
Adam C. Schneider
Stanimir Metchev
Alexandra Z. Greenbaum
S. Mark Ammons
René Doyon
Travis Barman
Michael P. Fitzgerald
Paul Kalas
Rebecca Oppenheimer
K. Ward-Duong
Thomas M. Esposito
Vanessa P. Bailey
Li Wei Hung
Mark S. Marley
Source :
The Astronomical Journal, 159(1), 1
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
IOP, 2019.

Abstract

We present a revision to the visual orbit of the young, directly-imaged exoplanet 51 Eridani b using four years of observations with the Gemini Planet Imager. The relative astrometry is consistent with an eccentric ($e=0.53_{-0.13}^{+0.09}$) orbit at an intermediate inclination ($i=136_{-11}^{+10}$\,deg), although circular orbits cannot be excluded due to the complex shape of the multidimensional posterior distribution. We find a semi-major axis of $11.1_{-1.3}^{+4.2}$\,au and a period of $28.1_{-4.9}^{+17.2}$\,yr, assuming a mass of 1.75\,M$_{\odot}$ for the host star. We find consistent values with a recent analysis of VLT/SPHERE data covering a similar baseline. We investigated the potential of using absolute astrometry of the host star to obtain a dynamical mass constraint for the planet. The astrometric acceleration of 51~Eri derived from a comparison of the {\it Hipparcos} and {\it Gaia} catalogues was found to be inconsistent at the 2--3$\sigma$ level with the predicted reflex motion induced by the orbiting planet. Potential sources of this inconsistency include a combination of random and systematic errors between the two astrometric catalogs or the signature of an additional companion within the system interior to current detection limits. We also explored the potential of using {\it Gaia} astrometry alone for a dynamical mass measurement of the planet by simulating {\it Gaia} measurements of the motion of the photocenter of the system over the course of the extended eight-year mission. We find that such a measurement is only possible ($>98$\% probability) given the most optimistic predictions for the {\it Gaia} scan astrometric uncertainties for bright stars, and a high mass for the planet ($\gtrsim3.6$\,M$_{\rm Jup}$).<br />Comment: 17 pages, 11 figures. Accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Astronomical Journal, 159(1), 1
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7ec4ca747b47eb3ad5c2ca3a5b5c7396