Back to Search
Start Over
Predicting resting energy expenditure in patients with musculoskeletal deformities
- Source :
- Clinical Nutrition. 13:286-290
- Publication Year :
- 1994
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 1994.
-
Abstract
- The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the commonly used equations (Harris-Benedict (HB), Schofield (S) and equations based on midarm circumference (MAC) and midarm muscle circumference (MAMC) in predicting resting energy expenditure (REE) in a population of patients with musculoskeletal deformities. 20 kyphoscoliotic patients (15 female (F); 5 male (M); mean age 59.6 years) and 10 controls (7 F; 3M; 59.8 years) were studied. REE measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) with a ventilated canopy system (Deltatrac metabolic monitor) was not significantly different between patients and controls (Mean (SD) REE (MJ/24 h): Patients: 5.48 (1.1); controls: 5.28(0.8)). In patients with deformities the Schofield equation gave values which were closest to measured REE (mean difference and limits of agreement IC vs S: 0.098 MJ/24 h; −0.822 and 1.018). The Harris-Benedict equation using height (Ht) and armspan (AS) in lieu of height also gave acceptable results (IC vs HB (Ht): 0.34; −0.638 and 1.318; IC vs HB (AS): 0.255; −0.683 and 1.253). Equations based on MAC and MAMC compared poorly (IC vs MAC equation: 0.398; −1.530 and 2.326; IC vs MAMC equation 0.687; −0.911 and 2.285). On regression analysis the equation REE = 0.295 (MAMC) + 0.0483 (AS) −0.0324 (age) −6.25 predicted REE best in the patient population (r2 = 0.861).
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
education.field_of_study
Nutrition and Dietetics
business.industry
Limits of agreement
Population
Mean age
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Circumference
Gastroenterology
Surgery
Schofield equation
Internal medicine
Basal metabolic rate
Medicine
Resting energy expenditure
In patient
business
education
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 02615614
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Clinical Nutrition
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7e02f6aad3cde621ea2e6b0ca65389e7
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5614(94)90051-5