Back to Search
Start Over
Development and validation of a radiomic signature to predict HPV (p16) status from standard CT imaging: a multicenter study
- Source :
- Leijenaar, R T H, Bogowicz, M, Jochems, A, Hoebers, F J P, Wesseling, F W R, Huang, S H, Chan, B, Waldron, J N, O'Sullivan, B, Rietveld, D, Leemans, C R, Brakenhoff, R H, Riesterer, O, Tanadini-Lang, S, Guckenberger, M, Ikenberg, K & Lambin, P 2018, ' Development and validation of a radiomic signature to predict HPV (p16) status from standard CT imaging: a multicenter study ', British Journal of Radiology, vol. 91, no. 1086 . https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170498, British Journal of Radiology, 91(1086). British Institute of Radiology, The British Journal of Radiology, British Journal of Radiology, 91(1086):2017049811075. British Institute of Radiology
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer (oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, OPSCC) is biologically and clinically different from HPV negative OPSCC. Here, we evaluate the use of a radiomic approach to identify the HPV status of OPSCC. Methods: Four independent cohorts, totaling 778 OPSCC patients with HPV determined by p16 were collected. We randomly assigned 80% of all data for model training (N = 628) and 20% for validation (N = 150). On the pre-treatment CT images, 902 radiomic features were calculated from the gross tumor volume. Multivariable modeling was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. To assess the impact of CT artifacts in predicting HPV (p16), a model was developed on all training data (M-all) and on the artifact-free subset of training data (M-no (art)), Models were validated on all validation data (V-all), and the subgroups with (V-art) and without (V-no (art)) artifacts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare HPV status based on p16 and radiomic model predictions. Results: The area under the receiver operator curve for M-all and M-no (art) ranged between 0.70 and 0.80 and was not significantly different for all validation data sets. There was a consistent and significant split between survival curves with HPV status determined by p16 [p = 0.007; hazard ratio (HR): 0.46], M-all (p = 0.036; HR: 0.55) and M-no (art) (P = 0.027; HR: 0.49). Conclusion: This study provides proof of concept that molecular information can be derived from standard medical images and shows potential for radiomics as imaging biomarker of HPV status. Advances in knowledge: Radiomics has the potential to identify clinically relevant molecular phenotypes.
- Subjects :
- Oncology
OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER
SELECTION
medicine.medical_specialty
FEATURES
610 Medicine & health
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
PARAMETERS
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
NECK-CANCER
TEXTURE ANALYSIS
10049 Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology
Internal medicine
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
medicine
Carcinoma
2741 Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
HEAD
Human papillomavirus
Papillomaviridae
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
Survival analysis
Proportional Hazards Models
Full Paper
Proportional hazards model
business.industry
MEDICINE
HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS
Cancer
General Medicine
medicine.disease
10044 Clinic for Radiation Oncology
3. Good health
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
Multicenter study
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA
Ct imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
business
Selection operator
Biomarkers
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00071285
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Leijenaar, R T H, Bogowicz, M, Jochems, A, Hoebers, F J P, Wesseling, F W R, Huang, S H, Chan, B, Waldron, J N, O'Sullivan, B, Rietveld, D, Leemans, C R, Brakenhoff, R H, Riesterer, O, Tanadini-Lang, S, Guckenberger, M, Ikenberg, K & Lambin, P 2018, ' Development and validation of a radiomic signature to predict HPV (p16) status from standard CT imaging: a multicenter study ', British Journal of Radiology, vol. 91, no. 1086 . https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170498, British Journal of Radiology, 91(1086). British Institute of Radiology, The British Journal of Radiology, British Journal of Radiology, 91(1086):2017049811075. British Institute of Radiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7de6e4c53797eb2f713314f3e750d546