Back to Search
Start Over
A methodology and theoretical taxonomy for centrality measures: What are the best centrality indicators for student networks?
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 12, p e0244377 (2020)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2020.
-
Abstract
- In order to understand and represent the importance of nodes within networks better, most of the studies that investigate graphs compute the nodes' centrality within their network(s) of interest. In the literature, the most frequent measures used are degree, closeness and/or betweenness centrality, even if other measures might be valid candidates for representing the importance of nodes within networks. The main contribution of this paper is the development of a methodology that allows one to understand, compare and validate centrality indices when studying a particular network of interest. The proposed methodology integrates the following steps: choosing the centrality measures for the network of interest; developing a theoretical taxonomy of these measures; identifying, by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), latent dimensions of centrality within the network of interest; verifying the proposed taxonomy of centrality measures; and identifying the centrality measures that best represent the network of interest. Also, we applied the proposed methodology to an existing graph of interest, in our case a real friendship student network. We chose eighteen centrality measures that were developed in SNA and are available and computed in a specific library (CINNA), defined them thoroughly, and proposed a theoretical taxonomy of these eighteen measures. PCA showed the emergence of six latent dimensions of centrality within the student network and saturation of most of the centrality indices on the same categories as those proposed by the theoretical taxonomy. Additionally, the results suggest that indices other than the ones most frequently applied might be more relevant for research on friendship student networks. Finally, the integrated methodology that we propose can be applied to other centrality indices and/or other network types than student graphs. ispartof: PLOS ONE vol:15 issue:12 ispartof: location:United States status: published
- Subjects :
- Computer science
Social Sciences
02 engineering and technology
Surveys
BIOLOGICAL NETWORKS
computer.software_genre
Geodesics
Infographics
Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
Sociology
Centrality
TOPOLOGY
Data Management
COMPLEX NETWORKS
Principal Component Analysis
Multidisciplinary
05 social sciences
Statistics
050301 education
Classification
Graph
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Social Networks
Research Design
Physical Sciences
Medicine
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Graphs
Network Analysis
Research Article
Computer and Information Sciences
Science
0206 medical engineering
Closeness
POWER
Geometry
Machine learning
Research and Analysis Methods
Betweenness centrality
MISSING DATA
Taxonomy (general)
Humans
DISTRIBUTIONS
Statistical Methods
Students
Taxonomy
Survey Research
Science & Technology
IDENTIFICATION
business.industry
Data Visualization
Biology and Life Sciences
Social Support
Models, Theoretical
PERFORMANCE
FRAMEWORK
Algebra
Linear Algebra
Multivariate Analysis
Artificial intelligence
SOCIAL NETWORKS
business
Eigenvectors
0503 education
computer
020602 bioinformatics
Mathematics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 12, p e0244377 (2020)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7dca13d26f086958479f2691fb9721fa