Back to Search Start Over

SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a Multinational Study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T)

Authors :
Alexandre Persu
Graeme Eisenhofer
Urs D Lichtenauer
Esther Korpershoek
Selda Aydin
Elena Rapizzi
Frédérique Tissier
Winand N.M. Dinjens
Thanh Huynh
Henri J L M Timmers
Marco Volante
Mercedes Robledo
Anne Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
Judith Favier
Maria Currás-Freixes
Lindsey Oudijk
Cécile Badoual
Letizia Canu
Arthur S. Tischler
Xavier Matias-Guiu
Gustavo B. Baretton
Massimo Mannelli
Ronald R. de Krijger
Francien H van Nederveen
Rita Domingues
Anthony J. Gill
Marcel Smid
Magdalena Białas
Roderick J. Clifton-Bligh
Jérôme Bertherat
Gabriella Nesi
Thomas G. Papathomas
R. Libe
Mauro Papotti
Karel Pacak
Felix Beuschlein
Miikka Vikkula
Anouk van Berkel
Pathology
Medical Oncology
Source :
Modern Pathology, 28(6), 807-821. Nature Publishing Group, Modern Pathology, 28, 807-21, Modern Pathology, 28(6), 807, Modern Pathology, 28, 6, pp. 807-21, Modern Pathology, 28(6), 807. Nature Publishing Group
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Despite the established role of SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry as a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for familial succinate dehydrogenase-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes, the reproducibility of the assessment methods has not as yet been determined. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver variability among seven expert endocrine pathologists using a web-based virtual microscopy approach in a large multicenter pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma cohort (n=351): (1) 73 SDH mutated, (2) 105 non-SDH mutated, (3) 128 samples without identified SDH-x mutations, and (4) 45 with incomplete SDH molecular genetic analysis. Substantial agreement among all the reviewers was observed either with a two-tiered classification (SDHB kappa= 0.7338; SDHA kappa = 0.6707) or a three-tiered classification approach (SDHB kappa = 0.6543; SDHA kappa = 0.7516). Consensus was achieved in 315 cases (89.74%) for SDHB immunohistochemistry and in 348 cases (99.15%) for SDHA immunohistochemistry. Among the concordant cases, 62 of 69 (similar to 90%) SDHB-/C-/D-/AF2-mutated cases displayed SDHB immunonegativity and SDHA immunopositivity, 3 of 4 (75%) with SDHA mutations showed loss of SDHA/SDHB protein expression, whereas 98 of 105 (93%) non-SDH-x-mutated counterparts demonstrated retention of SDHA/SDHB protein expression. Two SDHD-mutated extra-adrenal paragangliomas were scored as SDHB immunopositive, whereas 9 of 128 (7%) tumors without identified SDH-x mutations, 6 of 37 (similar to 16%) VHL-mutated, as well as 1 of 21 (similar to 5%) NF1-mutated tumors were evaluated as SDHB immunonegative. Although 14 out of those 16 SDHB-immunonegative cases were nonmetastatic, an overall significant correlation between SDHB immunonegativity and malignancy was observed (P=0.00019). We conclude that SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry is a reliable tool to identify patients with SDH-x mutations with an additional value in the assessment of genetic variants of unknown significance. If SDH molecular genetic analysis fails to detect a mutation in SDHB-immunonegative tumor, SDHC promoter methylation and/or VHL/NF1 testing with the use of targeted next-generation sequencing is advisable.

Details

ISSN :
15300285 and 08933952
Volume :
28
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7dc22938bac63eaba2f61693c2735e09