Back to Search
Start Over
The Effectiveness of Low-dose Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Sedative Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Retrospective Analysis
- Source :
- Medicina, Volume 56, Issue 4, Medicina; Volume 56; Issue 4; Pages: 193, Medicina, Vol 56, Iss 193, p 193 (2020)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- MDPI, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background and objectives: Flexible bronchoscopy has been widely used for diagnosis and intervention, while various drugs are used for sedation during bronchoscopy. We examined two regular standardized sedation options (with or without dexmedetomidine) regularly used in our regional hospital. The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine on conscious sedation under bronchoscopy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted from April 2017 to March 2018. All patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with moderate sedation were enrolled. Patients having received dexmedetomidine-propofol-fentanyl were defined as group D, and those having received midazolam-propofol-fentanyl were defined as group M. The primary outcome was a safety profile during the procedure, including the incidence of procedural interference by patient cough or movement, transient hypoxemia, and hypotension. The secondary outcome was measured by the recovery profile (awake and ambulation time). Results: Thirty-five patients in group D and thirty-three in group M were collected in this retrospective study. All patients underwent the procedure successfully. Group D showed higher safety with fewer procedural interference incidences by cough or body movement than Group M (3.3% versus 36.3%, p &lt<br />0.001) and minor respiratory adverse effects. Patients in group D showed faster recovery in a shorter ambulation time than group M (24.9 &plusmn<br />9.7 versus 31.5 &plusmn<br />11.9, p = 0.02). In group D, bronchoscopist satisfaction to sedation was higher than group M (p = 0.01). More transient bradycardia episodes were noted in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (p &lt<br />0.05), but all recovered without atropine intervention. Overall post-procedural adverse events and satisfaction were comparable in the two groups. Conclusions: The co-administration of dexmedetomidine met the safety and recovery demands of flexible bronchoscopy. Compared to the conventional midazolam-propofol-fentanyl regimen, the application of dexmedetomidine improved sedative effectiveness with less procedural interruptions, shorter time to ambulation and higher bronchoscopist satisfaction.
- Subjects :
- Bronchoscopist
Male
medicine.drug_class
Sedation
Midazolam
Conscious Sedation
Article
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Bronchoscopy
030202 anesthesiology
medicine
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
flexible bronchoscopy
procedural sedation
dexmedetomidine
midazolam
Dexmedetomidine
Propofol
Aged
Retrospective Studies
lcsh:R5-920
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Body movement
Retrospective cohort study
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Fentanyl
030228 respiratory system
Anesthesia
Sedative
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
medicine.symptom
lcsh:Medicine (General)
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 16489144 and 1010660X
- Volume :
- 56
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Medicina
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7d7756e2a95f65094613cf55ed012152